-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In Memory Vector Store not working [BUG] #2501
Comments
I have noticed this too, the In Memory Vector Store not working when you try to upsert from the Plain Text node. |
I have seen this too.
|
Actually... The AgentExecutor is not required. This is working for me. |
I forgot to mention... I had previously switched over to a Pinecone DB rather than the in-memory Vector Store and was still getting this error message until I switched out the ConversationalAgent for the ToolAgent. I have not tested this with the In-Memory Vector Store. |
I think the team, following the LangChain initiative, is trying to standardize the tools. Some of these tools may become outdated since they were built just for OpenAI. Now, in theory, the tools should work for Gemini, Mistral, Clause, and OpenAI, but this is not always the case. |
@mikkelkrogsholm and @toi500 |
@SoundMindsAI I was using the conversational qa chain |
Same issue here, seems like reverting to 1.7.2 helped |
I have the same issue when using OpenAI Assistant. The chatbot cannot get the information from in-memory vector store at all. 1.8.0 is not working and I had to revert to 1.7.2 |
Hi @HenryHengZJ can you have this one (and #2494 which I think is the same) looked at? I think something broke in 1.8.0 with RAG. |
Where can we find information on the RoadMap?
Would it be appropriate to include a Roadmap.md file?
Being new to Flowise, I’m not sure if this bug is something that should be
fixed or if there is a RoadMap direction that would mean that this should
never be fixed and that the preferred approach is X.
Do you have any documentation describing what should eventually be
consolidated based upon the direction of LaingChain? I’m not even sure
what consolidation Langchain is working on anyway. If someone wanted to
explain that would be great. If someone does explain this might be a great
GitHub Discussion.
Thanks for your help!
Eric
…On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:56 PM automaton82 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @HenryHengZJ <https://github.com/HenryHengZJ> can you have this one
(and #2494 <#2494> which
I think is the same) looked at? I think something broke in 1.8.0 with RAG.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2501 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIBCBWA32KN3NKQTCGNLORLZEVGYDAVCNFSM6AAAAABIMS45GCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMZWGQ3DMNZXGY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Will be pushing a new release with this fix soon! |
Pushed to |
Thanks!! |
Seems like the new docker image is messing up the vector store.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: