-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Remove client classes for JUnit refactor #1911
Conversation
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
Timestamp: 2021-05-11 17:36:32 |
import ftl.client.google.downloadAsJunitXml | ||
|
||
object DownloadAsJunitXML : | ||
FileReference.DownloadAsXML, | ||
(FileReference) -> JUnitTest.Result by { fileReference -> | ||
downloadAsJunitXml(fileReference).toApiModel() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@piotradamczyk5 I am a little confused as the removal of .toApiModel. Whats this change for? Or why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jan-gogo suggest that we should use api
data classes also in client
, because they are small
0ff7ae8
to
884315a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 👍
5c1069a
to
88a2647
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Code looks good
- All test pass
8da299c
to
070e5e7
Compare
070e5e7
to
ee0a9d9
Compare
Test Plan
This PR contains additional fixes for JUnit data layer refactor after conversation with @jan-gogo on Slack
Checklist