Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial changes: using attribute IDs when referencing attributes in normative paragraphs #593

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

ijurica
Copy link
Contributor

@ijurica ijurica commented Oct 7, 2024

Type of Editorial change:

Although attribute names were initially used for this purpose, for the sake of consistency and in accordance with the agreement made during the maintainers' meeting on Oct 8th, switching from attribute names to attribute IDs in the normative paragraphs, while retaining attribute names in the Content Constraints tables.

Scope of this PR:

This PR addresses references in the normative paragraphs of 12 columns and Metadata - CreationDate.
For the remaining column, CommitmentDiscountQuantity, please refer to PR #589.

…eferencing attributes in normative paragraphs
…ncing attribute in Metadata - CreationDate normative paragraph
@ijurica ijurica requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2024 23:10
@ijurica ijurica self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@jpradocueva jpradocueva added this to the v1.1 milestone Oct 8, 2024
@jpradocueva jpradocueva added consistency/review Consistency Review editorial Items that address editorial and minor changes labels Oct 8, 2024
@tobrien tobrien self-requested a review October 8, 2024 15:18
@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

Approved during the Members' call on Oct 8.

@jpradocueva jpradocueva merged commit 31276dd into working_draft Oct 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@jpradocueva jpradocueva deleted the editorial-attribute-reference branch October 8, 2024 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consistency/review Consistency Review editorial Items that address editorial and minor changes
Projects
Status: W.I.P
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants