-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lib: OMGWTFBBQ × 2 #4740
lib: OMGWTFBBQ × 2 #4740
Conversation
OMGWTFBBQ Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
... so we can pass prefix_ipv4/prefix_ipv6 in. Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
OMGWTFBBQ no. 2... Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
Sidenote: the the |
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8456/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8456/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8456/artifact/TOPOI386/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8456/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8456/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt
Warnings Generated during build:Debian 10 amd64 build: Successful with additional warningsDebian Package lintian failed for Debian 10 amd64 build:
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
Fixed warnings:
New warnings:
Static Analysis warning summary compared to base:
3 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
CI:rerun |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8458/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
Warnings Generated during build:Debian 10 amd64 build: Successful with additional warningsDebian Package lintian failed for Debian 10 amd64 build:
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
Fixed warnings:
New warnings:
Static Analysis warning summary compared to base:
3 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I ran scan-build against master and this PR and am seeing the same new warnings. If I was a guessing man I would guess that the changes for prefix_copy and prefix_same in the second commit is causing the changes in the scan. I'd like to understand/cleanup these new SA issues before this goes in.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42811 Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8464/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
Warnings Generated during build:Debian 10 amd64 build: Successful with additional warningsDebian Package lintian failed for Debian 10 amd64 build:
CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
prefix_cmp()
isn't likestrcmp()
/memcmp()
💣💥)
broke some of the typesafe lists 💣💥At least I'm only responsible for one of these 😞