zebra: Cleanup the memory from the hash for MPLS stuff (backport #11635) #11642
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![mergify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10562?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
==1595641== 280 (80 direct, 200 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 30 of 38 ==1595641== at 0x483AB65: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:760) ==1595641== by 0x493C89C: qcalloc (memory.c:116) ==1595641== by 0x1E8426: lsp_alloc (zebra_mpls.c:1116) ==1595641== by 0x49147F1: hash_get (hash.c:162) ==1595641== by 0x1EC880: mpls_lsp_install (zebra_mpls.c:3192) ==1595641== by 0x1C51BB: zread_vrf_label (zapi_msg.c:3197) ==1595641== by 0x1C6F11: zserv_handle_commands (zapi_msg.c:3863) ==1595641== by 0x24D0F4: zserv_process_messages (zserv.c:523) ==1595641== by 0x498F4CC: thread_call (thread.c:2002) ==1595641== by 0x49253A2: frr_run (libfrr.c:1198) ==1595641== by 0x1A28BA: main (main.c:475) ==1595641== ==1595641== 1,400 (400 direct, 1,000 indirect) bytes in 5 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 35 of 38 ==1595641== at 0x483AB65: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:760) ==1595641== by 0x493C89C: qcalloc (memory.c:116) ==1595641== by 0x1E8426: lsp_alloc (zebra_mpls.c:1116) ==1595641== by 0x49147F1: hash_get (hash.c:162) ==1595641== by 0x1EBD7C: mpls_zapi_labels_process (zebra_mpls.c:2915) ==1595641== by 0x1C35D9: zread_mpls_labels_add (zapi_msg.c:2513) ==1595641== by 0x1C6F11: zserv_handle_commands (zapi_msg.c:3863) ==1595641== by 0x24D0F4: zserv_process_messages (zserv.c:523) ==1595641== by 0x498F4CC: thread_call (thread.c:2002) ==1595641== by 0x49253A2: frr_run (libfrr.c:1198) ==1595641== by 0x1A28BA: main (main.c:475) Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 912b6a5)
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO9DEB10AMD64-6548/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9 Successful on other platforms/tests
|
|
ci:rerun |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6549/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #11635 done by Mergify.
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com