-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basic bus specification #97
Comments
OK. Let's define the generation method. A simple wire code block with a,b as input and c as output is created using Which one-line syntax would be interesting for new bus wire code blocks?
|
I think it is better to use the same syntax than verilog: a[7:0], b[7:0] El 21/11/2016 19:30, "Jesús Arroyo Torrens" [email protected] OK. Let's define the generation method. A simple wire code block with a,b as input and c as output. Is Which one-line syntax would be interesting for new bus wire code blocks?
— |
Done: #120 |
Bugfix --board argument. Closes FPGAwars#95
It would be great to have parcial implementation of the buses, only for connecting blocks.
Let's take this two blocks as an example, conected by a wire. It is done in icestudio like this:
If it was a bus (8 bits) instead of a wire, the generated code (in human readable verilog code) will be:
This is another example: the connection of 3 blocks:
If it was an 8 bits bus, the generated code should be like this:
Restrictions:
This implementation will let us to include a lot of new circuit in icestudio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: