Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove last few report.managerEmail uses #30515

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator commented Oct 27, 2023

cc @thienlnam since hopefully this will be the last change needed for tasks 🙏 (related to email -> accountID migration)

also cc @puneetlath so you're aware! we're getting close!

Details

We're working on getting rid of emails & using accountIDs instead - see https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/294647

Purpose = to increase privacy / prevent emails from being leaked around the app - in onyx & in API calls

Note: We need to watch out for creating reports / tasks with BRAND NEW users that we may / may not have personal details for yet. I believe we now store email addresses in personal details when we start chats (since we must have typed in their email address?) but I'm not 100% sure, which is why it needs to be tested.

Fixed Issues

$ Related to https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/294647
$ Finishes up https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/299956

Tests

Make sure task actions still work well:

  1. Create new task
  2. Edit task name / description
  3. Assignee (brand new & existing)

Note: You should test on multiple devices so you can make sure all task updates work correctly for:

  1. The receiver / assignee / report attendees
  2. The same user, on another device (ex: edit tasks on chrome & make sure you see the same correct updates on mobile)

Similarly, make a few money requests & edit / delete them, make sure everything still works perfectly

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above, everything should work optimistically offline

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native

(see MacOS: Chrome / Safari video)

iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-27.at.5.44.39.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@Beamanator Beamanator self-assigned this Oct 27, 2023
@Beamanator Beamanator requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2023 14:16
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Gonals and removed request for a team October 27, 2023 14:17
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2023

@Gonals Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! Should we have a C+ test it?

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@puneetlath Yesssss definitely! 👍 I'm going to do a bit of testing on my side too, then will look for a C+ to take this on 🙏

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Sweet, sounds good!

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

FINALLY tests pass, let's get some C+ to help test now! I uploaded a vid of some tests w/ ios & web

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @shubham1206agra for volunteering to help with this!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Can you merge latest main here?

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra done! 👍

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra just checking, are you able to review this today? 🙏

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Can you review this video (especially at the last)?

Screen.Recording.2023-10-31.at.8.14.46.PM.mp4

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra sorry I didn't see your message! Is there anything in particular you think isn't working properly? I'll watch and see if I notice anything

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Beamanator commented Nov 1, 2023

Aah it looks like deleting tasks isn't updating the other user live - have you noticed this before @thienlnam ? (see video above, around minute 2:22) - it looks like it did update both users when the user who created the task deleted it (around minute 1:22), but not when the other person deletes it (minute 2:22)

I guess the question @shubham1206agra is: Does that bug exist in staging / prod as well? If so, we can move forward with this PR. If not, it could be caused by my changes

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator I think you should first repro this, and test the same in production or staging

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra it would be great if you could try, if you can't repro in staging/prod I'm happy to give it a go - but I'm pretty busy with other things at the moment

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator The Same can be repro in prod. I think we can continue the review now.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice, yeah I agree @shubham1206agra 👍

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Nov 1, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-31.at.8.14.46.PM.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from marcaaron November 1, 2023 12:58
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 1, 2023

@marcaaron Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 1, 2023

🎯 @shubham1206agra, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #30695.

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah there are currently some PRs to fix some functionality with cancel task

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good to know @thienlnam 🙏

I'll fix merge conflicts 😓

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Conflicts fixed! @shubham1206agra can you please test again before we move forward? 🙏

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure why Melvin requested a review from me. Looks like an internal engineer was already assigned. Gonna unsubscribe, but lmk if an additional review is needed.

@marcaaron marcaaron removed their request for review November 2, 2023 04:31
@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Still works fine

@Gonals Gonals merged commit e36c722 into main Nov 2, 2023
13 checks passed
@Gonals Gonals deleted the beaman-removeReportManagerEmail branch November 2, 2023 13:28
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Gonals in version: 1.3.96-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.96-15 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.97-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants