Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix popover position for payment buttons #28744

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor

@Nikhil-Vats Nikhil-Vats commented Oct 3, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #26070
PROPOSAL: #26070 (comment)

Tests

You can test this using 2 of your accounts or you can also create a new workspace with only 1 member (logged in user) and request money. As you are the only member, request money button will be visible.

  1. Use 2 of your accounts for testing. Login with account 1, request money in the chat by going to chat with account 2 > click on + button > Request money > Enter details and click on request money button. Afterwards login with account 2 and follow the steps below -

  2. In the chat, click the pay button in Report Preview. The popover should open above the button.

    See screenshot to see what it should look like.

    image

  3. Now, click on the report preview and in the header try clicking on the caret (dropdown icon) and the main button and make sure both popovers open below the button.

    See video to see what it should look like.

    Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.1.30.43.AM.mov

  4. Now, go to settings > wallet. Click on transfer balance and verify that the popover opens below the transfer balance button.

    See video to see what it should look like.

    Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.1.32.07.AM.mov

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above.

QA Steps

Same as above.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
26070_web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
26070_mweb_chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
26070_mweb_safari.mp4
Desktop
26070_desktop.mp4
iOS
26070_ios.mp4
Android
26070_android.mp4

@Nikhil-Vats Nikhil-Vats requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2023 20:09
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aimane-chnaif and removed request for a team October 3, 2023 20:09
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2023

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ function ButtonWithDropdownMenu(props) {
) : (
<Button
success
ref={props.buttonRef}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aimane-chnaif I added this to fix this bug because I also found it during testing.

if (this.state.shouldShowAddPaymentMenu) {
this.setState({shouldShowAddPaymentMenu: false});
return;
}
this.setState({transferBalanceButton: event.nativeEvent.target});
this.setState({transferBalanceButton: this.anchorRef.current});
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was required for BaseWalletPage, as transfer balance button contains multiple clickable items so if we used event.nativeEvent.target the popover position used to differ slightly based on where we clicked. See video to see the bug -

Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.1.42.55.AM.mov

@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ function MoneyReportHeader({session, personalDetails, policy, chatReport, report
shouldShowPaymentOptions
style={[styles.pv2]}
formattedAmount={formattedAmount}
anchorAlignment={{
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In header button, popover should open below button (anchor should be at top)

@@ -230,6 +230,10 @@ function ReportPreview(props) {
enablePaymentsRoute={ROUTES.ENABLE_PAYMENTS}
addBankAccountRoute={bankAccountRoute}
style={[styles.requestPreviewBox]}
anchorAlignment={{
horizontal: CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_HORIZONTAL.LEFT,
vertical: CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_VERTICAL.BOTTOM,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In ReportPreview, popover should open above button so anchor is bottom.

popoverPlacement="bottom"
anchorAlignment={{
horizontal: CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_HORIZONTAL.LEFT,
vertical: CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_VERTICAL.TOP,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

popover should open below button, so vertical anchor position is top.

@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ class KYCWall extends React.Component {
* @returns {Object}
*/
getAnchorPosition(domRect) {
if (this.props.popoverPlacement === 'bottom') {
if (this.props.anchorAlignment.vertical === CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_VERTICAL.TOP) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

explanation here -

props.anchorAlignment.vertical === CONST.MODAL.ANCHOR_ORIGIN_VERTICAL.TOP
? y + h + CONST.MODAL.POPOVER_MENU_PADDING // if vertical anchorAlignment is TOP, menu will open below the button and we need to add the height of button and padding
: y - CONST.MODAL.POPOVER_MENU_PADDING, // if it is BOTTOM, menu will open above the button so NO need to add height but DO subtract padding
});

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif PR is ready for review.

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ class KYCWall extends React.Component {
(!isExpenseReport && !PaymentUtils.hasExpensifyPaymentMethod(paymentCardList, this.props.bankAccountList))
) {
Log.info('[KYC Wallet] User does not have valid payment method');
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(event.nativeEvent.target);
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(this.anchorRef.current);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aimane-chnaif if you want we can keep it as this.anchorRef.current || event.nativeEvent.target to be on the safer side. Same for usage above.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's do that for safety

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we apply the change for safety here and also above?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif let me know if you have any suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the detailed explanations per each line change

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ class KYCWall extends React.Component {
(!isExpenseReport && !PaymentUtils.hasExpensifyPaymentMethod(paymentCardList, this.props.bankAccountList))
) {
Log.info('[KYC Wallet] User does not have valid payment method');
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(event.nativeEvent.target);
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(this.anchorRef.current);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's do that for safety

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Step 3 doesn't work for me

Screen.Recording.2023-10-05.at.11.23.56.AM.mov

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif do you mean that the fix doesn't work for you?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif do you mean that the fix doesn't work for you?

yes, as you see my video. I tested this branch after pulling main locally

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@Nikhil-Vats you reproduced and working on fix, right?

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif can you please try again once? I just tested and it works for me. It was working for me before as well as I attached the test videos on all platforms and there was no merge with main either.

fix.mp4

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@Nikhil-Vats did you test after merging latest main?

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nikhil-Vats commented Oct 5, 2023

@aimane-chnaif I did not merge latest main as there is no conflict. Should I do it?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

I did not merge latest main as there is no conflict. Should I do it?

yes you should

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif It works after merging too, can you please recheck once?

Screen.Recording.2023-10-05.at.7.23.04.PM.mov

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nikhil-Vats commented Oct 5, 2023

I did not some weird with other bugs (before merge too) -

  1. Debit card sometimes redirect to a chat.
  2. ReportPreview shows Pay elsewhere even when I change it to Pay with expensify in expense report.

Let me know if you face them too and I will create bug reports for them.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

still pull main and push to this branch

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Oct 5, 2023

Make sure that you don't have any new commits not pushed. Bug is still not fixed on this branch

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif I have just pushed after merging with latest main. Can you test again?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Works fine now. Not sure what was wrong

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Oct 5, 2023

Let's leave this popover position at bottom
Edit: I see this is existing behavior on main. It's ideal to apply dynamic position based on scroll position but I think this can be out of scope.

Screen.Recording.2023-10-05.at.4.51.34.PM.mov

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mchrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
msafari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from marcochavezf October 5, 2023 16:27
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ class KYCWall extends React.Component {
(!isExpenseReport && !PaymentUtils.hasExpensifyPaymentMethod(paymentCardList, this.props.bankAccountList))
) {
Log.info('[KYC Wallet] User does not have valid payment method');
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(event.nativeEvent.target);
const clickedElementLocation = getClickedTargetLocation(this.anchorRef.current);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we apply the change for safety here and also above?

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcochavezf I have applied the suggested changes.

@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ class KYCWall extends React.Component {
this.setState({shouldShowAddPaymentMenu: false});
return;
}
this.setState({transferBalanceButton: event.nativeEvent.target});
const targetElement = this.anchorRef.current || event.nativeEvent.target; // safety check - use target from event if anchorRef is null
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add the comment above the code

Suggested change
const targetElement = this.anchorRef.current || event.nativeEvent.target; // safety check - use target from event if anchorRef is null
// Use event target as fallback if anchorRef is null for safety
const targetElement = this.anchorRef.current || event.nativeEvent.target;

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done @marcochavezf

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed @marcochavezf

@Nikhil-Vats
Copy link
Contributor Author

Don't know why it hasn't marked the suggestion as outdated but I added an empty line, check here

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, thanks guys!

@marcochavezf marcochavezf merged commit 8d42ad3 into Expensify:main Oct 5, 2023
11 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 5, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 1.3.79-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Oct 6, 2023

@marcochavezf @aimane-chnaif Step 4 is failing. We have silver wallet accounts only. I remember it requires gold wallet for "transfer balance" to appear. Could you confirm?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf @aimane-chnaif Step 4 is failing. We have silver wallet accounts only. I remember it requires gold wallet for "transfer balance" to appear. Could you confirm?

Correct. Transfer balance should not be visible to all accounts. Step 4 is testable only when you login with those accounts.
Btw Transfer balance visibility is not related to this PR.

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Oct 6, 2023

@aimane-chnaif , this will be validated internally?

Click on transfer balance and verify that the popover opens below the transfer balance button.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif , this will be validated internally?

Click on transfer balance and verify that the popover opens below the transfer balance button.

I think you can skip that case if you're not able to test easily.
@Nikhil-Vats and I demonstrated working as expected.
or @marcochavezf you will validate again internally?

web.mov

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants