Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add join and leave to user created rooms #28408

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi srikarparsi commented Sep 28, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/318329
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Create a room - (Global Create -> Send Message -> Room -> Create Room)
  2. Copy the share code - (Click on room name -> Share Code -> Copy URL to Clipboard)
  3. Leave the room - (Click on the three dots and ensure that leave room shows up)
  4. Re-join the room - (Paste the share url into the browser)
  5. Ensure leave room shows in the three dots menu
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.9.56.14.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome image
Mobile Web - Safari image
Desktop image
iOS image
Android

@srikarparsi srikarparsi self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Deploying with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 4ba83a2
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://ec1d8e97.helpdot.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://srikar-joinleaveusercreatedr.helpdot.pages.dev

View logs

@srikarparsi srikarparsi marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2023 06:29
@srikarparsi srikarparsi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2023 06:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ArekChr and removed request for a team October 10, 2023 06:29
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2023

@ArekChr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ArekChr! Wasn't able to run through the tests myself because I'm having some difficulty with my dev server but I'll go through them and specify more if needed tomorrow. In the meanwhile, please feel free to look over the code and test any flows you feel are necessary.

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 11, 2023

@srikarparsi Could you provide more detailed QA steps? By creating room you mean create group/workspace?

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ArekChr, just updated the test steps. By room I mean a user created room under a workspace.

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 12, 2023

@srikarparsi Thanks! Reviewing

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 12, 2023

@srikarparsi I still don't know if I'm following the QA steps correctly, by global create, do you mean the fab plus button? I don't see there is a Room option.

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey yeah, I wrote it in the testing steps but to create a room, you have to use the send message flow. I videod it in case that helps:

Screen.Recording.2023-10-12.at.5.15.53.PM.mov

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 13, 2023

@srikarparsi I don't have this option while creating the message. Do I need any specific permissions for that?

Zrzut ekranu 2023-10-13 o 10 35 36

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm yeah you might need to be under the beta. But I think you should be able to set this line to true to quickly access it: https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceNewRoomPage.js#L165

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 16, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb.chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb.safari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Oct 16, 2023

@srikarparsi Check mobile platforms, after leaving a room it navigates to Concierge chat, but it could navigate to all chat screens, wdyt?

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

srikarparsi commented Oct 17, 2023

Ah thanks! Not sure if this is expected behavior since it occurs on main but I made a bug report for it here. I think it's expected but either way I think this should be handled in a follow up issue since it currently occurs on main.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah so this is the error I'm getting but I haven't investigated it yet so it's all good if you don't know off the top of your head:

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

  • Where:
    Build file '/Users/srikarparsi/Expensidev/App/node_modules/react-native/build.gradle.kts' line: 13

  • What went wrong:
    Plugin [id: 'de.undercouch.download', version: '5.0.1', apply: false] was not found in any of the following sources:

  • Gradle Core Plugins (plugin is not in 'org.gradle' namespace)
  • Included Builds (None of the included builds contain this plugin)
  • Plugin Repositories (could not resolve plugin artifact 'de.undercouch.download:de.undercouch.download.gradle.plugin:5.0.1')
    Searched in the following repositories:
    MavenRepo
    Google
    Gradle Central Plugin Repository

Also, the test build just came up so I'll just run that tomorrow on an android and add in that screenshot :)

jasperhuangg
jasperhuangg previously approved these changes Oct 27, 2023
@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi conflicts

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi more conflicts 😓

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

DM me when you fix them so we can get this merged before they happen again

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

bump @srikarparsi what's the status on this one?

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @jasperhuangg! Sorry for the delay, I've been caught up with a bunch of other things but will resolve conflicts tomorrow and ping you once it's ready so that we don't run into more conflicts.

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @jasperhuangg, resolved conflicts and tested again and works well so this is ready for review whenever you get a chance :)

jasperhuangg
jasperhuangg previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2023
@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi ah linter is failing, do you mind updating with npm run prettier

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @jasperhuangg! Just did :)

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg merged commit 3f7e66a into main Nov 17, 2023
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg deleted the srikar-joinLeaveUserCreatedRooms branch November 17, 2023 20:34
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.1-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants