Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Copilot page #28361

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

Create Copilot page #28361

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

abekkala
Copy link
Contributor

@abekkala abekkala commented Sep 28, 2023

Adding the Copilot page info

Details

Fixed Issues

$
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android

Adding the Copilot page info
@abekkala abekkala requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2023 03:36
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 28, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team September 28, 2023 03:36
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 28, 2023

@hayata-suenaga Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from hayata-suenaga September 28, 2023 03:36
@abekkala abekkala requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for hayata-suenaga September 29, 2023 06:15
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@abekkala please add a .md extension to the filename - Copilot.md

docs/articles/expensify-classic/account-settings/Copilot Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

abekkala commented Oct 2, 2023

@rushatgabhane @hayata-suenaga
I'm sorry, I don't know how to go back and edit the filename? 😬

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Oct 2, 2023

@abekkala No prob!

  1. Go to https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/abekkala-patch-1/docs/articles/expensify-classic/account-settings/Copilot
  2. Click edit
  3. Add a .md to file name
  4. Commit changes
Screen.Recording.2023-10-02.at.20.12.52.mov

needed to add .md to the title
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@abekkala we need to remove the comments <--- --->
Please replace the content with:

---
title: Copilot
description: Safely delegate tasks without sharing login information.
---

# About
The Copilot feature allows you to safely delegate tasks without sharing login information. Your chosen user can access your account through their own Expensify account, with customizable permissions to manage expenses, create reports, and more. This can even be extended to users outside your policy or domain.

# How-to
# How to add a Copilot
1. Log into the Expensify desktop website.
2. Navigate to *Settings > Account > Account Details > _Copilot: Delegated Access_*.
3. Enter the email address or phone number of your Copilot and select whether you want to give them Full Access or the ability to Submit Only.
   - *Full Access Copilot*: Your Copilot will have full access to your account. Nearly every action you can do and everything you can see in your account will also be available to your Copilot. They *will not* have the ability to add or remove other Copilots from your account.
   - *Submit Only Copilot*: Your Copilot will have the same limitations as a Full Access Copilot, with the added restriction of not being able to approve reports on your behalf.
4. Click Invite Copilot.

If your Copilot already has an Expensify account, they will get an email notifying them that they can now access your account from within their account as well.
If they do not already have an Expensify account, they will be provided with a link to create one. Once they have created their Expensify account, they will be able to access your account from within their own account.

# How to use Copilot
A designated copilot can access another account via the Expensify website or the mobile app.

## How to switch to Copilot mode (on the Expensify website):
1. Click your profile icon in the upper left side of the page.
2. In the “Copilot Access” section of the dropdown, choose the account you wish to access.
3. When you Copilot into someone else’s account, the Expensify header will change color and an airplane icon will appear.
4. You can return to your own account at any time by accessing the user menu and choosing “Return to your account”.

## How to switch to Copilot Mode (on the mobile app):
1. Tap on the menu icon on the top left-hand side of the screen, then tap your profile icon.
2. Tap “Switch to Copilot Mode”, then choose the account you wish to access.
3. You can return to your own account at any time by accessing the user menu and choosing “Return to your account”.

# How to remove a Copilot
If you ever need to remove a Copilot, you can do so by following the below steps:
1. Log into the Expensify desktop website
2. Navigate to *Settings > Your Account > Account Details > _Copilot: Delegated Access_*
3. Click the red X next to the Copilot you'd like to remove


# Deep Dive
## Copilot Permissions
A Copilot can do the following actions in your account:
- Prepare expenses on your behalf
- Approve and reimburse others' expenses on your behalf (Note: this applies only to **Full Access** Copilots)
- View and make changes to your account/domain/policy settings
- View all expenses you can see within your own account

## Copilot restrictions
A Copilot cannot do the following actions in your account: 
- Change or reset your password
- Add/remove other Copilots

## Forwarding receipts to [email protected] as a Copilot
To ensure a receipt is routed to the Expensify account in which you are a copilot rather than your own you’ll need to do the following:
1. Forward the email to [email protected]
2. Put the email of the account in which you are a copilot in the subject line
3. Send


# FAQ
## Can a Copilot's Secondary Login be used to forward receipts?
Yes! A Copilot can use any of the email addresses tied to their account to forward receipts into the account of the person they're assisting.

## I'm in Copilot mode for an account; Can I add another Copilot to that account on their behalf?
No, only the original account holder can add another Copilot to the account.
## Is there a restriction on the number of Copilots I can have or the number of users for whom I can act as a Copilot?
There is no limit! You can have as many Copilots as you like, and you can be a Copilot for as many users as you need.

#28361 (review)

made necessary edit noted in above comment
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@abekkala please follow this instruction to sign the agreement

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hayata-suenaga

@abekkala please follow #28361 (comment) to sign the agreement

I'm confused why I would need to sign a contributor license agreement, do all Expensify employees need to sign that in order to create a new help page?

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@abekkala yes I even had to do that 😄 the only thing you need to do is to comment the following sentence

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

It's just for the automation system to allow us to merge the PR 🙇

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@rushatgabhane could you do the checklist please?

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rushatgabhane is there anything else I need to do here to get this one done?

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@rushatgabhane please complete the checklist when you have time 🙇

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rushatgabhane can you please complete the checklist when you have time

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rushatgabhane can you please complete the checklist

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

pinged @rushatgabhane on Slack

@abekkala
Copy link
Contributor Author

abekkala commented Nov 1, 2023

@rushatgabhane any update here?
Is there anything you need from me?

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

I pinged him over in slack

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image ## Reviewer Checklist
  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from youssef-lr November 2, 2023 07:29
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 2, 2023

@youssef-lr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 2, 2023

🎯 @rushatgabhane, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #30749.

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga merged commit 207266c into main Nov 2, 2023
14 of 70 checks passed
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga deleted the abekkala-patch-1 branch November 2, 2023 17:29
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/hayata-suenaga in version: 1.3.96-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.96-15 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.97-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants