Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix pressing Enter key still triggers the Create Group while Shortcut modal opens. #18273

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 4, 2023

Conversation

azimgd
Copy link
Contributor

@azimgd azimgd commented May 2, 2023

Details

Adds enter shortcut for KeyboardShortcutsModal so that you can close it by pressing enter. Decrease priority for Enter keys on BaseOptionsSelector and MoneyRequestAmountPage modals.

Fixed Issues

$ #17590
PROPOSAL: #17590 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Open "Create Group" modal by pressing CMD+SHIFT+K
  2. Open "Keyboard shortcuts" modal by pressing CMD+J
  3. Pressing Enter should first close "Keyboard shortcuts" modal, pressing enter again should select members on "Create Group" list
  4. Open "Send Money" modal
  5. Open "Keyboard shortcuts" modal by pressing CMD+J
  6. Pressing Enter should first close "Keyboard shortcuts" modal, pressing enter again submit form on "Send Money" modal

Offline tests

Same as Tests.

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Same as Tests.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native (not applicable)
    • Android / Chrome (not applicable)
    • iOS / native (not applicable)
    • iOS / Safari (not applicable)
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-05-02.at.19.36.55.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome

(not applicable)

Mobile Web - Safari

(not applicable)

Desktop
shortcuts2.mov
iOS

(not applicable)

Android

(not applicable)

@azimgd azimgd requested a review from a team as a code owner May 2, 2023 14:44
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from mollfpr and robertjchen and removed request for a team May 2, 2023 14:44
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@robertjchen @mollfpr One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented May 2, 2023

@mollfpr Could you please have a look?

Copy link
Contributor

@mollfpr mollfpr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @azimgd for this PR. Just need some clarity.

src/components/KeyboardShortcutsModal.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/iou/steps/MoneyRequestAmountPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/KeyboardShortcutsModal.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented May 3, 2023

Thanks @mollfpr, addressed your comments.

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented May 3, 2023

Thanks @azimgd looks better now! I'll start testing it now.

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented May 3, 2023

Tested OptionsSelector enter functionality still works, while the KeyboardShortcutsModal press enter will close the modal.

  • MoneyRequestConfirmationList
  • NewChatPage
  • SearchPage
  • YearPickerPage
  • IOUCurrencySelection
  • MoneyRequestParticipantsSelector
  • MoneyRequestParticipantsSplitSelector
  • PronounsPage
  • TimezoneSelectPage
  • WorkspaceInvitePage

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented May 3, 2023

@azimgd There's a regression in the group split bill confirmation list; pressing Enter in the option selection should select/deselect the option, not submit the form.

  1. Go to the group chat
  2. Open action and select Split Bill
  3. Enter an amount
  4. Press the arrow keys to highlight the option and press enter after the option is highlighted
Screen.Recording.2023-05-03.at.15.38.14.mov

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented May 3, 2023

Another issue we already address is the issue about the arrow key in the options list. When the KeyboardShortcutsModal is open, the arrow key shouldn't be usable for traveling the options list.

Screen.Recording.2023-05-03.at.15.41.41.mov

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented May 3, 2023

Thank you for your detailed review @mollfpr, fixed both issues.

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

mollfpr commented May 3, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
18273.Web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
18273.mWeb.Chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
18273.mWeb.Safari.mp4
Desktop
18273.Desktop.mov
iOS
18273.iOS.mp4
Android
18273.Android.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@mollfpr mollfpr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @azimgd for the quick update!

Just small detail and we will good to go.

@@ -40,19 +40,50 @@ class KeyboardShortcutsModal extends React.Component {
KeyboardShortcutsActions.showKeyboardShortcutModal();
}, openShortcutModalConfig.descriptionKey, openShortcutModalConfig.modifiers, true);

const closeShortcutModalConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.ESCAPE;
this.unsubscribeEscapeModal = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(closeShortcutModalConfig.shortcutKey, () => {
/**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just small detail, I believe this comments block should use // instead /** in the block comment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's your idea behind using inline vs multiline codeblock?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We mainly use multiline code blocks for the JSDoc and the prop-types comment. I couldn't find documentation, but I recall we've reviewed this before.

@robertjchen Could you help confirm this?

I'm okay if we are not strict about it now, just something came up in my mind.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got you, thanks. Updated.

Copy link
Contributor

@mollfpr mollfpr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @azimgd! LGTM and tests well 👍

All yours @robertjchen

Copy link
Contributor

@robertjchen robertjchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@robertjchen robertjchen merged commit f524362 into Expensify:main May 4, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 4, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 4, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/robertjchen in version: 1.3.10-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.12-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines +52 to +65
const closeShortcutEnterModalConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.ENTER;
this.unsubscribeCloseEnterModal = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(closeShortcutEnterModalConfig.shortcutKey, () => {
ModalActions.close();
KeyboardShortcutsActions.hideKeyboardShortcutModal();
}, closeShortcutEnterModalConfig.descriptionKey, closeShortcutEnterModalConfig.modifiers, true, () => !this.props.isShortcutsModalOpen);

// Intercept arrow up and down keys to prevent scrolling ArrowKeyFocusManager while this modal is open
const arrowUpConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.ARROW_UP;
this.unsubscribeArrowUpKey = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(arrowUpConfig.shortcutKey, () => {
}, arrowUpConfig.descriptionKey, arrowUpConfig.modifiers, true, () => !this.props.isShortcutsModalOpen);

const arrowDownConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.ARROW_DOWN;
this.unsubscribeArrowDownKey = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(arrowDownConfig.shortcutKey, () => {
}, arrowDownConfig.descriptionKey, arrowDownConfig.modifiers, true, () => !this.props.isShortcutsModalOpen);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following BugZero checklist: This code caused the regression here: #18420

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants