-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LHN - Missing space between user and to in "invited 1 userto #room" when inviting user to room #47248
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @blimpich ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @sakluger ( |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsb |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Missing space between user and to in "invited 1 userto #room" when inviting user to room What is the root cause of that problem?
Line 418 in 9aa78ff
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We should add space before the value returned from result.alternateText += ` ${ReportUtils.formatReportLastMessageText(`${preposition} ${roomName}`)}`; Note: we can check for all instances of What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
Shouldn't be blocking backend deploys, and I'd also say this probably isn't a frontend deploy blocker either. It doesn't look good but I don't think its a blocker. |
@etCoderDysto thank you for pointing out the problematic code 🙏. In the future when proposing a solution to an issue marked as a Generally for deploy blockers we would assign this to the contributor who caused the regression in the first place. But we might assign to a contributor who makes a proposal if (A) the contributor who caused the regression isn't available to work on it or isn't easily reachable via Slack (B) we don't want to revert the original PR and (C) the issue is truly urgent and the contributor who proposed a fix is able to work on it quickly. For this case I think A & B are true, but I don't think C is true. I don't consider this urgent. So I'm going to assign the original contributor and C+ to work on this as follow up. |
Sorry, I will do that for the future. |
@blimpich i'll raise follow up PR soon
We are having some issues with adding new people to Slack so I can't get into Slack right now. |
FYI - I'll be OOO for the next week, back on Aug 30. @blimpich hopefully I won't be needed between now and then - if so, you can assign another BZ member by removing me, then removing and re-adding the Bug label. |
Triggered auto assignment to @greg-schroeder ( |
This seems to have been deployed to prod on 8/19 - regression period is through today |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: v9.0.19-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
#admins report preview in LHN will display "invited 1 user to #room".
Actual Result:
#admins report preview in LHN displays "invited 1 userto #room".
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6570031_1723474843471.20240812_225750.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: