[HOLD for payment 2024-01-16] [TS migration] Migrate 'PopoverWithMeasuredContent.js' component to TypeScript

[melvin-bot]

TypeScript migration

Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.

Files

Path	Dependencies
src/components/PopoverWithMeasuredContent.js	11

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @jliexpensify

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[pasyukevich]

Hi,
I'm Eugene from Callstack - an expert contributor group
I’d like to work on this issue

[melvin-bot]

@melvin-bot[bot], this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing.

If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @danieldoglas, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @jliexpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

[mountiny]

Going to take over as the PR is ready

[mountiny]

@eVoloshchak is paid through NewDot, can you request $250 and note here?

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.19-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [TS migration] Migrate 'PopoverWithMeasuredContent.js' component to TypeScript #32551

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-05. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @eVoloshchak requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests
• @pasyukevich does not require payment (Contractor)

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@eVoloshchak] Please propose regression test steps to ensure the new feature will work correctly on production in further releases.
• [@jliexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

[Pujan92]

Linking the comment here which I believe is a regression.

[jliexpensify]

Thanks! @eVoloshchak can you check this out? Thanks!

[pasyukevich]

@eVoloshchak @jliexpensify

PR with the fix is open
#33835

[jliexpensify]

Payment Summary

• C+: @eVoloshchak $125 (regression, request on New.Dot)

[jliexpensify]

Moving to weekly, waiting to be deployed to prod.

[jliexpensify]

Deployed to PROD - Payment date is 16th January.

For JMills: Payment summary here

[JmillsExpensify]

$125 approved for @eVoloshchak based on this summary.