-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-08-02] [$1000] Web - #admin is highlighted in LHN but shows Concierge report screen #21408
Comments
ProposalPlease re-state the problem#admin is highlighted in LHN but shows Concierge report screen on newly created account. What is the root cause of that problem?The root cause is that when the
App/src/libs/actions/Policy.js Lines 1045 to 1049 in 6183609
Here we just set the route params to the But since we are only updating the What changes do you think we should make to solve this problem?We can just navigate to both the routes using if (shouldNavigateToAdminChat) {
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.getReportRoute(adminsChatReportID));
}
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.getWorkspaceInitialRoute(policyID)); Notice that I'm also adding a parameter to the Result Screen.Recording.2023-06-23.at.2.05.38.PM.movWhat other approach did you explore?I also tried having the |
Triggered auto assignment to @twisterdotcom ( |
Looks like something related to As a reminder, please make sure that all proposals are not workarounds and that any and all attempt to fix the issue holistically have been made before proceeding with a solution. Proposals to change our Feel free to drop a note in #expensify-open-source with any questions. |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01975cb777161dce5e |
Current assignee @twisterdotcom is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @abdulrahuman5196 ( |
@abdulrahuman5196 - I think @esh-g's proposal looks good. At least the outcome video seems correct anyway. Wonder if we could get this one assigned quickly! |
Sure will check on this today and update |
@esh-g I am not sure if i am aligned to make 2 navigations to solve this issue. Consider small screen devices it will add 2 navigations on the navigation stack, how will it behave there? |
@abdulrahuman5196 That is why I have added these lines to the proposal. I know that it will push unexpected screens for small screen devices, that is why I'm proposing to only navigate to admins chat on full screen devices as small screen devices can navigate to only one screen at a time. |
@abdulrahuman5196 Should I provide a branch from my fork to test with for these changes? |
I am OOO! Adding another BZ for the week. |
Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify ( |
@abdulrahuman5196 This is how it looks on small screens: Screen.Recording.2023-06-28.at.9.49.06.PM.movAnd this is the change I was mentioning in my proposal of passing a
To this: onSelected: () => this.interceptAnonymousUser(() => Policy.createWorkspace('', false, '', false, !this.props.isSmallScreenWidth)), |
📣 @abdulrahuman5196 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
📣 @esh-g 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Upwork job |
📣 @gadhiyamanan 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reporter role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
Thanks for assigning me! 🚀 |
@twisterdotcom, @abdulrahuman5196, @esh-g, @aldo-expensify Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
@aldo-expensify I was waiting for @abdulrahuman5196 to test a comment I left 4 days ago... I'm sorry for not bumping sooner. |
PR merged |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.45-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-08-02. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
This was caused during navigation refractor.
yes
|
Payment summary: @abdulrahuman5196 paid $1000 here: https://www.upwork.com/nx/wm/workroom/34164769/overview Internal TestRail issue: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/304920 |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Concierge should be highlighted in LHN
Actual Result:
#admin is highlighted in LHN but shows Concierge report screen
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.3.28-5
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Screen.Recording.2023-06-16.at.3.40.08.PM.mov
Recording.3233.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @gadhiyamanan
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1686910566735839
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: