Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 1, 2020. It is now read-only.

Feature layer options #102

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 22, 2015
Merged

Feature layer options #102

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 22, 2015

Conversation

jwasilgeo
Copy link
Contributor

@tomwayson please review. I modified the feature-layers example docs page a bit in 8515ae4, and perhaps even replicated too much functionality from the related test page. Feel free to suggest cutting something from that.

The changelog has also been updated. gh-pages should be updated after this PR as well.

Resolves #97 and #100.

Thanks!

Jacob Wasilkowski added 7 commits September 16, 2015 07:47
…structor options to be passed in; added some extended comments for upcoming documentation; moved definitionExpression from $attrs to $scope for future watch changes

esriMap: inspired by additions to esriFeatureLayer, so added an additional check during infoWindow Popup construction; also added more comments for upcoming docs
moved $scope.$watch definitions out of link function and into controller function;
added $scope.$watch for opacity and definitionExpression;
modified feature-layers test page to accommodate new options and bound scope variables;
resolves #97 and resolves #100
…re layer, and some documentation to the feature-layers example page;

modified var names for additional readability
@tomwayson tomwayson self-assigned this Sep 21, 2015
tomwayson added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2015
@tomwayson tomwayson merged commit 944cf81 into master Sep 22, 2015
@tomwayson
Copy link
Member

Well done @jwasil! Very thorough and thoughtful implementation.

I agree that the Feature Layers example page is a little bit busy now, but I don't have any suggestions as to how to simplify it, or break it up at this time. We can open an issue for this later if needed.

@tomwayson tomwayson deleted the feature-layer-options branch September 22, 2015 04:15
@jwasilgeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review and feedback! I appreciate it. Yeah, wrt Feature Layers, maybe something like an example with no (or few) esriFeatureLayer options, and another example with a combination of more options; but as you said, later.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants