feat: implemented gptme.vim plugin

[ErikBjare]

Fixes #213

gptme wrote all of this, I'm honestly stunned.

It is amazingly good, I will prob be using this all the time!

---

Important

Introduces a Vim plugin for gptme enabling direct interaction from Vim with configurable settings and key mappings.

• Features:
  • Implements a Vim plugin for gptme allowing interaction directly from Vim.
  • Supports running gptme queries with context from the current buffer.
  • Results are displayed in a new buffer.
  • Configurable context size and key mappings.
• Installation:
  • Instructions for installation using vim-plug and manual installation in scripts/vim/README.md.
• Usage:
  • Provides :Gptme command and <Leader>g mapping for running gptme.
  • Handles visual selection and context around the cursor.
• Configuration:
  • Settings for context lines and key mappings in .vimrc.
• Files Added:
  • scripts/vim/README.md: Documentation for the plugin.
  • scripts/vim/doc/gptme.txt: Help file for the plugin.
  • scripts/vim/plugin/gptme.vim: Main plugin script.

^{This description was created by for 889a213. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 889a213 in 44 seconds

More details

• Looked at 213 lines of code in 4 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. scripts/vim/doc/gptme.txt:15

• Draft comment:
  The command in the documentation is :Gptme, but in the implementation, it is :gptme. Consider using consistent casing for the command name in both documentation and implementation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment addresses a potential inconsistency between the documentation and the implementation. However, the implementation details are not visible in the diff, so it's unclear if the issue exists. Without evidence from the diff, the comment may not be actionable.
  The comment could be valid if the implementation indeed uses a different casing, but without seeing the implementation, it's speculative. The comment assumes an issue without providing evidence from the diff.
  The comment is speculative because it lacks evidence from the diff. Without seeing the implementation, we cannot confirm the inconsistency.
  Delete the comment because it is speculative and lacks evidence from the diff to support its claim.

2. scripts/vim/README.md:36

• Draft comment:
  The command in the documentation is :gptme, but in the implementation, it is :Gptme. Consider using consistent casing for the command name in both documentation and implementation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

3. scripts/vim/plugin/gptme.vim:71

• Draft comment:
  The command in the implementation is :Gptme, but in the documentation, it is :gptme. Consider using consistent casing for the command name in both documentation and implementation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

4. scripts/vim/plugin/gptme.vim:65

• Draft comment:
  The command in the implementation is :Gptme, but in the documentation, it is :gptme. Consider using consistent casing for the command name in both documentation and implementation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_qeIpzUWX55VJxwUb

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.63%. Comparing base (cdd8c6b) to head (889a213).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #241      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.68%   72.63%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          60       60              
  Lines        3833     3833              
==========================================
- Hits         2786     2784       -2     
- Misses       1047     1049       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
anthropic/claude-3-haiku-20240307	71.64% <ø> (ø)
openai/gpt-4o-mini	71.53% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.