docs: improved getting started, tool docs, and docstrings #193
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 391f092 in 25 seconds
More details
- Looked at
500lines of code in11files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/cli.rst:15
- Draft comment:
The addition of the non-interactive mode and multiprompt syntax explanation is a helpful enhancement for users looking to automate tasks. The example provided is clear and practical. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR introduces a new section in the CLI documentation for thegptmecommand, explaining the non-interactive mode and multiprompt syntax. This is a useful addition for users who want to automate tasks without manual confirmation. The explanation is clear and provides a practical example.
2. docs/conf.py:115
- Draft comment:
TheChatDirectiveclass is a valuable addition for rendering chat-like interactions in the documentation, improving readability and user engagement. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR adds a new classChatDirectivein the Sphinx configuration file, which processes chat messages in the documentation. This is a useful feature for rendering chat-like interactions in the documentation, enhancing readability and user engagement.
3. docs/getting-started.rst:32
- Draft comment:
The use of.. rubric::for section headings improves readability and helps users quickly locate specific information. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR improves the getting started guide by organizing sections with.. rubric::for better readability. This change helps users quickly locate specific information, enhancing the overall user experience.
4. docs/server.rst:6
- Draft comment:
The note about the web UI's limitations is important for setting user expectations and avoiding confusion about its current capabilities. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR adds a note about the web UI's limitations in the server documentation. This is important for setting user expectations and avoiding confusion about the current capabilities of the web UI.
5. docs/tools.rst:13
- Draft comment:
The addition of new tools likeSubagentandVisionexpands the tool's capabilities, providing users with more options and enhancing versatility. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR adds new tools and categories in the tools documentation, such asSubagentandVision. This expansion provides users with more options and capabilities, enhancing the tool's versatility.
6. gptme/tools/base.py:63
- Draft comment:
The use of.. rubric::for structuring instructions and examples inget_docimproves the clarity and organization of the tool documentation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR modifies theget_docmethod inToolSpecto include instructions and examples in a more structured format using.. rubric::. This change improves the clarity and organization of the documentation generated for each tool.
7. gptme/tools/browser.py:50
- Draft comment:
The use ofToolUsefor generating example outputs standardizes presentation, enhancing consistency and clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR updates theexamplesin thebrowser.pyfile to use theToolUseclass for generating output. This change standardizes the way examples are presented, making them more consistent and easier to understand.
Workflow ID: wflow_QfNu0J4HPEDGI8Qz
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #193 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.39% 80.44% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 56 56
Lines 3305 3308 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 2657 2661 +4
+ Misses 648 647 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ErikBjare
force-pushed
the
dev/better-docs
branch
from
391f092 to
8878d9b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8878d9b in 13 seconds
More details
- Looked at
768lines of code in16files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. gptme/tools/browser.py:12
- Draft comment:
The added instructions for installing the browser tool withplaywrightshould resolve the issue mentioned in the PR description. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:10%
The PR description mentions improving the documentation and docstrings, including the browser tool. The issue was about the browser tool not being available despite playwright being installed. The PR adds instructions for installing the browser tool with playwright, which should resolve the issue.
Workflow ID: wflow_LHhS1xHVEHEGyGp8
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on ef5af58 in 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
296lines of code in8files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/conf.py:93
- Draft comment:
The PR description mentions resolving issue 191, which is about the browser tool not being available despite playwright being installed. However, this PR only includes documentation updates and does not address the issue of the browser tool's availability. Please ensure that the issue is resolved in this PR. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_kGZ2oiSVfzAZ6MhH
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0f731a3 in 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
55lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/_static/custom.css:15
- Draft comment:
The comment 'Doesn't work reliable, since size is variable' is unclear. Consider rephrasing to 'Height adjustment may not be reliable due to variable content size.' - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The CSS comment on line 15 is unclear and should be corrected for clarity.
Workflow ID: wflow_FvmPwjg24VpWog9O
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2521a8a in 11 seconds
More details
- Looked at
17lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. gptme/tools/gh.py:15
- Draft comment:
Consider using triple double quotes for multi-line strings to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The use of triple single quotes for multi-line strings is inconsistent with the rest of the codebase, which uses triple double quotes.
Workflow ID: wflow_dW7FM9SPLviRte6P
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #191
Important
Improves documentation and docstrings for
gptme, enhancing guides, tool usage instructions, and updates Sphinx configuration.getting-started.rstwith clearer instructions and examples for initiating chats and making changes.cli.rstwith detailed CLI usage examples, including non-interactive mode.server.rstto clarify server and web UI usage.tools.rstto include new tools likeSubagentandVision.gptme/tools/base.py,browser.py,read.py,save.py,tmux.py, andvision.py.conf.pyto include new classes and improve HTML output options.custom.cssto improve layout.This description was created by
for 2521a8a. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.