Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addressing #865 with desert biome example #1445

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

This PR is picking up and will hopefully close multiple issues related to the biome hierarchy and semantics.

The approach used is to leverage a process class for ecological succession in climax communities. We acknowledge that the notion of climax communities is being refined in modern ecology, and have attempted to reflect this in the definitions and terminology (i.e. we do not content that any ecological community can ever reached an idealised climax state, but we do not that successional process can slow or maintain a community).

We'll start with a desert example, get the pattern stable, and then propagate changes across terms (xref #1321)

@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg requested a review from cmungall September 7, 2023 14:03
@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg linked an issue Sep 7, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
cmungall
cmungall previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2023
@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member Author

Merging to include the examples developed in this PR. Further refactoring will proceed in a consolidated issue for biomes.

@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg merged commit 7cbab0f into master Sep 7, 2023
2 checks passed
@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg deleted the 865-refactoring-biome branch September 7, 2023 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactoring biome
3 participants