Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add async validation to BRS-026 #124

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

ebbeknudsen
Copy link
Contributor

@ebbeknudsen ebbeknudsen commented Jan 23, 2025

Description

  • Refactor BRS-026 & BRS-028 to use shared transition activities.
  • Add async validation pattern
  • Add (moved from Wholesale) async validation to BRS-026
  • Add (moved from Wholesale) async validation tests for BRS-026

References

Link to assignment: https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/mosaic-60a6105157304f00119be86e/issues/gh/energinet-datahub/team-mosaic/375

Checklist

  • Should the change be behind a feature flag?
  • Can the feature be meaningfully disabled or circumvented if there are issues (e.g., database-breaking changes)?
  • Has it been considered whether data is being delivered to the wrong actor?
  • Subsystem test executed (dev_002/dev_003)
  • Is there time to monitor state of the release to Production?
  • Reference to the task

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Test results for \source\ProcessManager.Orchestrations.Tests\bin\Release\net8.0\Energinet.DataHub.ProcessManager.Orchestrations.Tests.dll

136 tests   134 ✅  2m 17s ⏱️
  1 suites    2 💤
  1 files      0 ❌

Results for commit 6741769.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ebbeknudsen ebbeknudsen merged commit 9ac8021 into main Jan 28, 2025
30 checks passed
@ebbeknudsen ebbeknudsen deleted the xedkn/brs-026-028-async-validation branch January 28, 2025 07:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants