Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade most dependencies #59

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024
Merged

Upgrade most dependencies #59

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

bwestlin
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • I have read the Contributor Guide
  • I have read and agree to the Code of Conduct
  • I have added a description of my changes and why I'd like them included in the section below

Description of Changes

Upgraded most dependencies as there are a lot of old ones, main thing I wanted to update was octocrab as we've been seeing some recurring errors that could be helped with a newer octocrab.

I have tested running manually as well as checked that cargo test passes.

@bwestlin bwestlin requested a review from davidpdrsn as a code owner April 25, 2024 09:29
@bwestlin bwestlin requested a review from vojd April 25, 2024 09:29
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ impl Client {
.inner
.pulls(&self.owner, repo)
.list_reviews(pr_number)
.send()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this something new in the latest version? What does it do?

Copy link
Member Author

@bwestlin bwestlin Apr 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, previously .list_reviews() would give an impl Future but it has been extended to return a Builder where e.g. paging can be configured, so the .send() is needed to make the actual request now.

targets = [
{ triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-musl" },
]

[advisories]
vulnerability = "deny"
unmaintained = "deny"
version = 2
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bwestlin
Copy link
Member Author

@vojd Updated deny.toml as well

Copy link
Contributor

@davidpdrsn davidpdrsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bwestlin bwestlin merged commit edb1104 into main Apr 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@bwestlin bwestlin deleted the bwe/upgrade-deps branch April 25, 2024 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants