Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/dv3 parallel stochastic #225

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

belerico
Copy link
Member

@belerico belerico commented Mar 1, 2024

Summary

This PR introduces the possiblity to have the Dreamer-V3 representation model (the one responsible to output the posterior) to be independent from the recurrent model.

Type of Change

Please select the one relevant option below:

  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)

Checklist

Please confirm that the following tasks have been completed:

  • I have tested my changes locally and they work as expected. (Please describe the tests you performed.)
  • I have added unit tests for my changes, or updated existing tests if necessary.
  • I have updated the documentation, if applicable.
  • I have installed pre-commit and run locally for my code changes.

Screenshots or Visuals (Optional)

image

where the pink one is DV3 with the parallel stochastic while the blue is the standard one.

Additional Information (Optional)

Please provide any additional information that may be useful for the reviewer, such as:

  • Any potential risks or challenges associated with the changes.
  • Any instructions for testing or running the code.
  • Any other relevant information.

Thank you for your contribution! Once you have filled out this template, please ensure that you have assigned the appropriate reviewers and that all tests have passed.

@belerico belerico merged commit c79b3eb into main Mar 4, 2024
10 checks passed
@belerico belerico deleted the feature/dv3-parallel-stochastic branch March 12, 2024 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants