Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jgfouca/more xml #62

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 16, 2016
Merged

Jgfouca/more xml #62

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 16, 2016

Conversation

jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor

This request supersedes #61 and solves issues with xml Lockedfiles not matching. I also renamed the
module CIME/create_test.py to CIME/system_test.py since a noun makes more sense to me as an object name than a verb does.

jgfouca and others added 7 commits February 11, 2016 15:36
…data

Things to note:
1) Machines will now need to specific python information in the modules
section of config_machines.xml
2) Fix a few mistakes in config_component.xml, errant ">" character
3) Implemented Case class from perl-OO branch
  * This should replace xmlquery/xmlchange
4) Had to get rid of XML version in xmlchange. This was causing XML
files to diff between locked files. This restriction can go away
once everything is using Case.
5) New python tools that need to be in caseroot are symlinked instead
of copied. This makes it so all the python/utils don't have to be copied.
6) Add classes for all the env*.xml files. They all inherit from a common
base class to reduce code duplication.
7) Add new env_module module to replace ModuleLoader.pm
@jgfouca
Copy link
Contributor

jgfouca commented Feb 16, 2016

This one got a little too big to review, especially with your and my changes mixed together. I tried to go through git log -p to review.

@jedwards4b jedwards4b deleted the jgfouca/more_xml branch February 17, 2016 21:41
jayeshkrishna pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2016
 Changes to pioperformance.F90 to get it to build and run with PIO1.
jgfouca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants