Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cam dust emiss control #2699

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek commented Aug 15, 2024

Description of changes

Fix dust emissions control when running coupled to CAM.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #2687
Fixes #2709
Fixes #2712

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No

Testing performed, if any: will be regular
So far just running namelist testing

…elist to use to determine dust_emis settings, still check that they aren't set in the user_nl_clm file
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Aug 16, 2024

#2709 blocks the fix for this working.

…ns allowed are much more complex now, this resolves ESCOMP#2709
Get it working with bringing in the CAM drv_flds_in file.
And make it not matter on the --megan --drydep --fire_emis options.
Also do dust_emis before the other drv_flds_in namelists,
so the CAM namelist is loaded.
bld/CLMBuildNamelist.pm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ekluzek ekluzek changed the base branch from master to b4b-dev August 22, 2024 18:06
@ekluzek ekluzek requested a review from slevis-lmwg August 22, 2024 21:36
Copy link
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ekluzek gave me and Will a guided explanation of this PR. This resolves immediate needs with temporary fixes. These will be revisited later with longer term solutions. Thanks, Erik!

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Aug 23, 2024

@fvitt and I went over this on a high level and agreed to what's being done here for the short term. I don't like some of what's being done, but think it's OK for the short term. And since this tag needs to happen ASAP we will go with what we have working here.

@ekluzek ekluzek added PR status: ready PR: this is ready to merge in, with all tests satisfactory and reviews complete and removed PR status: work in progress labels Aug 23, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek merged commit 1ddecad into ESCOMP:b4b-dev Aug 27, 2024
2 checks passed
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the cesm3_0_beta03 milestone Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability PR status: ready PR: this is ready to merge in, with all tests satisfactory and reviews complete priority: Immediate Highest priority, something that was unexpected
Projects
Status: Done (non release/external)
Status: Done
2 participants