-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
decomp_depth_efolding appears (with the same value) in the namelist and the params files; the model ends up using the one from the namelist #1473
Comments
We didn't change anything. I just switched to using the namelist for
perturbations instead of the paramfile.
…On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:22 AM will wieder ***@***.***> wrote:
@ekluzek <https://github.com/ekluzek>, @olyson <https://github.com/olyson>,
or @djk2120 <https://github.com/djk2120> is this corrected on the PPE
branch?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1473 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNHR5QFFT6U6XVUL2OH5DDUKK6OJANCNFSM5DCISJ2A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Seems like we should fix this somehow to avoid future errors. Maybe the
best in the long run would be to remove teh namelist option and use what's
on parameter file, to be more consistent with what we do with most
parameters.
…On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:46 AM djk2120 ***@***.***> wrote:
We didn't change anything. I just switched to using the namelist for
perturbations instead of the paramfile.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:22 AM will wieder ***@***.***> wrote:
> @ekluzek <https://github.com/ekluzek>, @olyson <
https://github.com/olyson>,
> or @djk2120 <https://github.com/djk2120> is this corrected on the PPE
> branch?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1473 (comment)>, or
> unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNHR5QFFT6U6XVUL2OH5DDUKK6OJANCNFSM5DCISJ2A
>
> .
> Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
> <
https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675
>
> or Android
> <
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub
>.
>
>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1473 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVGB27Z4XRZAYUUCMN3UKK2F7ANCNFSM5DCISJ2A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
@olyson can you update this on the PPE branch, then we can merge to master? |
@ekluzek how would you like me to handle this? Branch off of latest master? I think you've been managing the PPE branch. |
oh, maybe we can just make the change on main, that's where the change actually could come it. it should be a simple bfb change? |
It should be bfb. Looking at the issue, it seemed like Sam had already done this on the mimics branch? When does that come to main? |
If it is on mimics branch already, seems like we can just wait and let this
get sorted with mimics comes on.
…On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:56 PM Keith Oleson ***@***.***> wrote:
It should be bfb. Looking at the issue, it seemed like Sam had already
done this on the mimics branch? When does that come to main?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1473 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVFYIHLLH7EJTEMA33DUKLQPRANCNFSM5DCISJ2A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Makes sense, without a real need to push for 'release' of CTSM5.1 we can let this get fixed with #1318 |
Brief summary of bug
decomp_depth_efolding
appears (with the same value) in the namelist and the params files; the model ends up using the one from the namelist. I report this as a bug because users may wrongly believe that they can change the value of this parameter by updating the params files.General bug information
CTSM version you are using:
ctsm5.1.dev053-48-g1c1a9451
Does this bug cause significantly incorrect results in the model's science? [Yes / No]
No, unless user thought that they were modifying the value via the params files.
Configurations affected:
Configurations using vertically resolved DecompCascadeBGC or DecompCascadeCN (deprecated) for below-ground decomposition.
Details of bug
Summary gives enough detail.
To correct, @slevisconsulting will remove
decomp_depth_efolding
from the namelist.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: