Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qqAmiAura12 EAR #162

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

qqAmiAura12 EAR #162

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

talioto
Copy link
Collaborator

@talioto talioto commented Feb 21, 2025

Assembly review request

  • ToLID: qqAmiAura12
  • Species: Amilenus aurantiacus
  • Project: ERGA-BGE
  • Affiliation: CNAG

Copy link
Contributor

erga-ear-bot bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Hi @talioto, thanks for sending the EAR of Amilenus aurantiacus.
I added the corresponding tag to the PR and will contact a supervisor and a reviewer ASAP.

Copy link
Contributor

erga-ear-bot bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Hi @additive3, do you agree to supervise this assembly?
Please reply to this message only with OK to give acknowledge.

@additive3
Copy link
Collaborator

additive3 commented Feb 21, 2025 via email

Copy link
Contributor

erga-ear-bot bot commented Feb 21, 2025

*****
EAR Reviewer Selection Process
Date: 2025-02-21 14:53

All Eligible Candidates:

Github ID | Full Name      | Institution | Total Reviews | Last Review | Active | Busy | Calling Score | Adjusted Score
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EmilieTeo | Emilie Teodori | Genoscope   | 3             | 2025-02-20  | Y      | N    | 1018          | 1068          
andar27   | Adama Ndar     | Genoscope   | 3             | 2025-02-21  | Y      | N    | 1018          | 1068          
diegomics | Diego De Panis | IZW         | 8             | 2024-10-22  | Y      | N    | 991           | 986           

Selected reviewer: Emilie Teodori (EmilieTeo)
The decision was based on:
- different institution ('Genoscope')
- active ('Y')
- not busy ('N')
- oldest review and fewest reviews among the finalists (1068)

Copy link
Contributor

erga-ear-bot bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Hi @EmilieTeo, do you agree to review this assembly?
Please reply to this message only with Yes or No by 27-Feb-2025 at 19:53 CET

@EmilieTeo
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes

@erga-ear-bot erga-ear-bot bot requested a review from EmilieTeo February 24, 2025 07:17
Copy link
Contributor

erga-ear-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Thanks for agreeing!
I appointed you as the EAR reviewer.
I will keep your status as Busy until you finish this review.
Please check the Wiki if you need to refresh something. (and remember that you must download the EAR PDF to be able to click on the link to the contact map file!)
Contact the PR assignee for any issues.

@EmilieTeo
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @talioto

Here are my few suggestions :

  • Invert SUPER_1 49.29-50.52Mb
  • Invert SUPER_4 36.50-37.37Mb
  • Move scaffold_2 to SUPER_2 as unloc

It's difficult to see any more changes that could be necessary since there isn't a lot of contacts outside of the main scaffolds, especially for the shrapnels

Best,
Emilie

@talioto
Copy link
Collaborator Author

talioto commented Feb 24, 2025

Invert SUPER_1 49.29-50.52Mb Done.
Invert SUPER_4 36.50-37.37Mb Actually, I needed to invert 37-42
Move scaffold_2 to SUPER_2 as unloc

Additionally, based on hap1 pretext, looking at mq0, mq20 and mq40, I localized the three unloc scaffolds of SUPER_10.
New savestate here: https://ccnag-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/tyler_alioto_cnag_eu/ETAyHoxunl5MrMuYDCkiig8B77-8pC3Ni3sy7Wdsiok72g?e=T2fMdv

These spiders we're working on are highly repetitive. The unplaced sqequence corresponds to repetitive sequence that is hard to uniquely place.

@EmilieTeo
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, you're right I wrote the coordinates wrong, it was the region 37-42 in SUPER_4 that needed to be inverted
I opened your savestate and it looks good to me. I agree with the changes in SUPER_10 as well

Best,
Emilie

@additive3
Copy link
Collaborator

@talioto
I don't really have much to add. Was going to suggest that SUPER_10 pieces could be merged into single chromosome scaffold.
If you have mq 0 map. It would be really helpful from QC perspective to review this..for any genome. Filtering out repeats makes it hard to guage scaffold integrity and unloc sequences.

Best,
Jo

@talioto
Copy link
Collaborator Author

talioto commented Feb 25, 2025

I did refer to the mq0 map of the yahs scaffolds, but I find it difficult to curate both at the same time. It's here if you want to try to make sense of it. https://ccnag-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/personal/tyler_alioto_cnag_eu/Documents/AAT/Curation/ERGA_Genomes/qqAmiAura12/qqAmiAura_hifiasm.prim.mq0.extensions.pretext?csf=1&web=1&e=4kKcbW
Since for the EAR we share the curated, re-mapped contact map, it's hard to go back and forth. From now on, we will try to produce mq0 and mq40 maps for everything we look at. BTW, is there an intermediate MQ that works better? MQ1, MQ5, MQ10???

@additive3
Copy link
Collaborator

@talioto there isn't a significant difference with any mq score >0

@additive3
Copy link
Collaborator

@talioto I do not have access to the file you just posted

@talioto
Copy link
Collaborator Author

talioto commented Feb 25, 2025

sorry. here: https://ccnag-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/tyler_alioto_cnag_eu/EdPhnFt5eHxEtlVhc0LGfP8BAJI2wio2AGb_xVryTuMahA?e=zbDNpQ
Again, it's on the yahs scaffolds and not the curated assembly.

@talioto
Copy link
Collaborator Author

talioto commented Mar 4, 2025

Are you waiting for me? I suppose I will generate a new EAR and share both the mq0 and mq40 maps...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants