-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixture/some improvements #46
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I left some minor comments :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The output name sounds a bit odd to be. This is the one that contains the marker genes that weren't found in the bins, right?
Maybe "missing_marker_genes.csv"?
write_table(b.state, result_table) | ||
|
||
if b.state["marker_set"]["quality"] != "good": | ||
logging.debug("Quality is not good") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a definition of "good" somwhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kind of...
Line 23 in 698c32d
if len(self.covered) < (0.5 * len(self.all_places)): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add that to the README
bad_quality.csv
andno_placement_marker_genes.txt
for folder mode. Related to Folder mode missed results for some bins #43. I answered there what is going on.