Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indicators refactor (part 3) #634

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Jan 19, 2022

Conversation

nseam
Copy link
Contributor

@nseam nseam commented Jan 18, 2022

No description provided.

kenorb and others added 30 commits October 28, 2021 23:15
* tag 'v2.009': (77 commits)
…) returning an error even if iCustom was not yet executed.
…d default shift for IndicatorBase::GetEntry() from -1 to 0. AMA and BWMFI don't work yet.
…or class bases. Also reverted back to using Indicator<T> as parent for IndicatorCandle (and later for IndicatorTick).
… one). BWMFI somehow return 0 in first calculation buffer.
…ation and automatic value (price) storage fetching after SetDataSource().
…ith ticks from data source, e.g., to feed AMA from Tick/Candle indicator when they ticks and provides new ask/bid prices.
…us ticks, instead of random ones collected in DictStruct.
… with wrong order of mode and index parameters.
kenorb and others added 9 commits January 8, 2022 17:49
* dev-indi-custom:
  EA: Adds enum's comment
  Adds Indi_Custom indicator
…inal. We need to test some other, more simple indicator like MA(on SMA) in order to be 100% sure there's no differences at all, as there shouldn't be. AMA may differ if it has too many historic entries at start.
@kenorb kenorb changed the title Indicators refactor Indicators refactor (part 3) Jan 18, 2022
@kenorb kenorb added this to the v2.011 milestone Jan 18, 2022
@kenorb kenorb force-pushed the dev-indicator-refactor branch from 08fabb3 to 6ee889c Compare January 18, 2022 17:12
@kenorb kenorb merged commit 57af000 into EA31337:dev-indicator-refactor Jan 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants