Disable rust compile on dockerfile

[GuillaumeDSM]

Based on #1611
thanks to @gabriel-milan

[Herklos]

Nice ! 🎉

[Herklos]

Still running after ~3h 😄

[gabriel-milan]

Yeah same thing that happened to mine.

Error: buildx call failed with: error: failed to solve: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = docker exporter does not currently support exporting manifest lists

Idk why this is happening as this is the official Docker GH action.

[gabriel-milan]

Update: I was able to build it on my RPi as it is on the disable_rust_compile_on_dockerfile branch. It took a while though (~2.5 hours). I'll try to come up with something for this GH action that's failing.

[GuillaumeDSM]

Update: I was able to build it on my RPi as it is on the disable_rust_compile_on_dockerfile branch. It took a while though (~2.5 hours). I'll try to come up with something for this GH action that's failing.

Great news !
Thanks for this @gabriel-milan

[gabriel-milan]

Well, it seems to be OK (https://github.com/gabriel-milan/OctoBot/pull/3/checks?check_run_id=2183699151).

Apparently, when you use --load (or load: true on the YAML), you're forcing the builder driver to docker (see docs) and for now it still doesn't support multi-platform builds (as previously mentioned on docker/buildx#59). By removing it, it builds just fine.

I'm not quite sure that, by doing this, the caching mechanism will work, but I think it will. Besides that, this GH action looks like an alternative if we can't dig deeper on this issue.

Finally, I think that the only thing that still needs changing on the Dockerfile is on lines 150 and 169 (in my current version) by adding linux/arm/v7 to the platform list.

GitHub

Fix/docker arm by gabriel-milan · Pull Request #3 · gabriel-milan/OctoBot

Thank you for sending your pull request. But first, have you included unit tests, and is your code PEP8 conformant? More details Summary Explain in one sentence the goal of this PR Solve the issue:...

[gabriel-milan]

It's me again, guys. I've checked and I think that this

Finally, I think that the only thing that still needs changing on the Dockerfile is on lines 150 and 169 (in my current version) by adding linux/arm/v7 to the platform list.

is still missing. Would you like me to commit it somewhere or you guys can do it?

[GuillaumeDSM]

It's me again, guys. I've checked and I think that this

Finally, I think that the only thing that still needs changing on the Dockerfile is on lines 150 and 169 (in my current version) by adding linux/arm/v7 to the platform list.

is still missing. Would you like me to commit it somewhere or you guys can do it?

I created this PR, is it what you where thinking to add ? #1616

[gabriel-milan]

It's me again, guys. I've checked and I think that this

Finally, I think that the only thing that still needs changing on the Dockerfile is on lines 150 and 169 (in my current version) by adding linux/arm/v7 to the platform list.

is still missing. Would you like me to commit it somewhere or you guys can do it?

I created this PR, is it what you where thinking to add ? #1616

Yeah, that's exactly it. Sorry I've missed that, thank you again!

[GuillaumeDSM]

Thank you for quickly noticing the issue !