-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Trivy] Support for properties #3369
Comments
@fnxpt Did you do some testing by chance as per what properties specifically need to be provided? I added an integration test here that documents the current state of things: Lines 128 to 193 in 91afc7d
I played around with sending the listed properties to Trivy, but even when I send them all, I don't get any vulnerabilities. |
Im not passing the properties yet... the test I did was simple sending it manually to trivy |
Yes I meant manual testing. When I tested yesterday I modified the code accordingly. |
I need to double check it... not sure if I will be able to do it today, but for sure tomorrow |
Thanks, but no need to sweat it. I was hoping to close this gap before the 4.11 release. Adding support for component properties isn't that much work. There is a pending PR from a contributor that brings us 80% there. So if we can proof that forwarding properties works as expected, I can add this capability. |
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
Relates to DependencyTrack#3369 Signed-off-by: nscuro <[email protected]>
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Current Behavior
Currently when scanning with trivy analyser we are not able to pass properties from sbom since they are not stored
Proposed Behavior
As soon as #2560 is fixed we can use these properties in #3251
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: