Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade aerospike dependency on Python 3 #9552

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2021
Merged

Upgrade aerospike dependency on Python 3 #9552

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2021

Conversation

ofek
Copy link
Contributor

@ofek ofek commented Jun 17, 2021

Motivation

Support Python 3.9

@ofek ofek requested review from a team as code owners June 17, 2021 20:03
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #9552 (4694bb4) into master (e97eb15) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Flag Coverage Δ
aerospike 86.92% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@ofek ofek mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Merged
@ofek ofek force-pushed the ofek/aerospike branch from 07a4a84 to 09e83c9 Compare June 17, 2021 23:12
@ofek ofek force-pushed the ofek/aerospike branch from 09e83c9 to 4694bb4 Compare June 18, 2021 22:45
@ofek ofek merged commit 7055beb into master Jun 21, 2021
@ofek ofek deleted the ofek/aerospike branch June 21, 2021 13:55
alexandre-normand pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
@ofek @alexandre-normand
Upgrade aerospike dependency on Python 3 (#9552)
b3e5b63
@FlorianVeaux FlorianVeaux mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vickenty vickenty vickenty approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dependencies integration/aerospike integration/datadog_checks_base
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ofek @vickenty