Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDMS-200 add test for movement not found #23

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

craigedmunds
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

CDMS-200 improved CachingBlobService implementation
@craigedmunds craigedmunds force-pushed the feature/cdms-200-decision-analytics branch from 317f8a9 to aa45e3f Compare December 17, 2024 16:48
@craigedmunds craigedmunds marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 15:16
Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Health
Btms.Business 62% 36%
Btms.Types.Gvms.Mapping 38% 26%
Btms.Metrics 82% 0%
Btms.Types.Gvms 67% 100%
Btms.Types.Alvs.Mapping 76% 0%
Btms.Types.Ipaffs.Mapping 73% 30%
TestDataGenerator 61% 48%
Btms.Azure 43% 75%
Btms.BlobService 31% 19%
Btms.Analytics 86% 71%
Btms.Backend.Data 65% 61%
Btms.Consumers 76% 68%
Btms.Common 82% 25%
Btms.Model 91% 98%
Btms.SyncJob 73% 62%
Btms.SensitiveData 80% 81%
Btms.Types.Ipaffs 94% 56%
Btms.Types.Alvs.Mapping.V1.Tests 0% 0%
Btms.Types.Alvs 84% 67%
Btms.Emf 11% 6%
Btms.Backend 64% 50%
Summary 72% (6287 / 8765) 46% (507 / 1102)

@craigedmunds craigedmunds merged commit 5259079 into main Dec 18, 2024
1 check passed
@craigedmunds craigedmunds deleted the feature/cdms-200-decision-analytics branch December 18, 2024 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants