Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDMS-215 adds tests for alvs decisions arriving before btms decisions, and fixed an issue with the pairing not working in this case #104

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

craigedmunds
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@craigedmunds craigedmunds changed the title CDMS-215 fixes code style errrors CDMS-215 adds tests for alvs decisions arriving before btms decisions, and fixed an issue with the pairing not working in this case Jan 31, 2025
@craigedmunds craigedmunds force-pushed the feature/cdms-215 branch 2 times, most recently from 3ad206e to 834c927 Compare January 31, 2025 15:05
Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

@craigedmunds craigedmunds merged commit 523a494 into main Jan 31, 2025
3 checks passed
@craigedmunds craigedmunds deleted the feature/cdms-215 branch January 31, 2025 15:13
Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Health
Btms.Consumers 76% 57%
Btms.Azure 43% 100%
Btms.Business 85% 78%
Btms.Types.Alvs.Mapping.V1.Tests 0% 0%
Btms.Types.Ipaffs 95% 62%
Btms.Types.Gvms 67% 100%
Btms.Types.Alvs.Mapping 81% 0%
Btms.Types.Gvms.Mapping 38% 26%
Btms.Model 92% 94%
Btms.Common 74% 56%
TestDataGenerator 86% 78%
Btms.Types.Ipaffs.Mapping 77% 61%
Btms.BlobService 39% 27%
Btms.Metrics 87% 0%
Btms.Backend.Data 68% 61%
Btms.Types.Alvs 85% 50%
Btms.SensitiveData 79% 83%
Btms.SyncJob 63% 45%
Btms.Backend 61% 42%
TestGenerator.IntegrationTesting.Backend 83% 71%
Btms.Analytics 74% 73%
Btms.Emf 11% 0%
Summary 79% (9858 / 12523) 64% (1040 / 1614)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants