Skip to content

Helper for using xDebug breakpoints with method/function chaining

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Cyber-Duck/fluent-debug

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

6 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

🚨 Discontinued 🚨

This package will no longer be supported.

Fluent / Chaining Methods/ Functions xDebug Library

##Why?

Frameworks like Laravel make heavy usage of, and encourage, method chaining

Consider code like the following random line taken from Laravel framework:

Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')
->in($configPath) 

That looks lovely. But there's a problem. Suppose I'm interested in the return value of

Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')

and I wish to examine this in a debugger.

At present, the only way I'm aware of doing this in PHP1 with xDebug is either to step through it, or to tediously rewrite the code to introduce intermediate variables, i.e. rewrite the above to

$a = Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')

//put breakpoint on this line:
$a->in($configPath) 

which doesn't sound particularly difficult in this example but soon becomes a massive mess.

Let's consider another random line:

Chicken::load(meatProcess($sausage->bacon()));

Suppose I'm interested in the return value of $sausage->bacon() here. Where do I stick a breakpoint to get that? If I put it on the line, I have to step through the call to bacon and intercept the return value, which is sometimes rather difficult. Or perhaps I can put the breakpoint on the first line of the call to meatProcess. A third option is to do something like

Chicken::load(meatProcess(($a = $sausage->bacon())->ketchup()));
$a;

And put a breakpoint on the second line. But suppose the call to ketchup has altered $a? You're going to be misled!

And in any case, I'm messing up the code again.

This kind of thing is why some programmers are against method chaining in general - the debugging really is made much harder.

See for example https://ocramius.github.io/blog/fluent-interfaces-are-evil/

But we live in the real world and it's a popular way of doing things, and done well as with Laravel it makes your code so much simpler to read.

##How?

So here I present a very simple extension that I believe takes out the vast majority of the debugging pain caused by fluent method chaining.

The extension is in two parts. Firstly, there is a trait with two methods. debugBreak and debugBreakIf. These are essentially wrappers around the xdebug_break function installed with xdebug.

Usage is like:

Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')
->debugBreak()
->in($configPath) 

or perhaps:

Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')
->debugBreakIf(2 === $a)
->in($configPath) 

or indeed:

Finder::create()
->files()
->name('*.php')
->debugBreakIf(function(){return app()->isRunningUnitTests();))
->in($configPath) 

To use this, add use CyberDuck\Traits\DebugsFluently to any class where you wish to use it (or possibly its parent). On my ever increasing todo list is a plan to write something that will add this to every class for you automatically.

Secondly - primarily intended for usage in function chaining - are the global functions debugBreak and debugBreakIf.

The above example would become

Chicken::load(meatProcess(debugBreak($sausage->bacon())->ketchup()));

Or there is debugBreakIf - The second argument works in the same way as the debugBreakIf method in the trait.

###Footnotes

1: There is a way in .NET - see https://davefancher.com/2016/01/28/functional-c-debugging-method-chains/

About

Helper for using xDebug breakpoints with method/function chaining

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages