Correction of the classfication of mono-exons #303
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ic, not NIC. Only when the monoexon spans a whole intron will be considered NIC by intron retention
pabloati
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
Correction of the classfication of mono-exons
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, mono-exons, not classified as FSM or ISM, and contained inside a transcript, were classified as NIC. Now, only those mono-exons spaning a whole intron of the transcript are considered NIC (by intron retention), otherwise, they are considered genic. On the other hand, mono-exons starting before the beginning or ending after the end of the reference transcript were classified as genic, even if they span a whole intron. Now, these transcripts that start/finish before/after the reference transcript and span a whole intron are classified as NIC.
While doing this I found a bug in the classification of ISM mono-exons (probably affecting a very limited number of transcripts). This has also been fixed.