Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17]add contact us endpoint #32

Merged

Conversation

stanislawK
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@OtisRed
Copy link
Contributor

OtisRed commented Mar 6, 2019

@stanislawK ping me when conflicts are resolved so it could be tested properly. I think if we merge it first then it would be easier to double check frontend.

stanislawK and others added 2 commits March 6, 2019 19:11
Copy link
Contributor

@jacekkalbarczyk jacekkalbarczyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to be ok. Validation works fine, server responds with correct status codes and messages.

Copy link
Contributor

@OtisRed OtisRed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested it, using the front from #34 because I couldn't write a proper json request in Postman ^^ Anyway it works well with the frontend and returns nice 200. But I didn't tested validation on the backend side so I just trust @jacekkalbarczyk that they work there as well (on the front they work just all right). I looked through the code and it looks good to me.

As soon as the conflict is resolved and the typo in the title of this ticket corrected we are ready to merge.

@stanislawK stanislawK changed the title [17]add contatct us endpoint [17]add contact us endpoint Apr 17, 2019
@stanislawK stanislawK merged commit e037dff into CodeForPoznan:master Apr 17, 2019
@stanislawK stanislawK deleted the 17_contact_us_api_endpoint branch April 17, 2019 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants