-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Forest 53 x 04 jpt #2
Conversation
…into forest_53X_04_jpt
Is anyone looking at this? I'm not sure what JetPlusTrack means, have you talked with the highPt group already? |
Hello, Yes, Yetkin proposed me to proceed with github after I mentioned that I want to include another jet energy correction algorithm into HIForest. Thanks, Stepan From: R. Alex Barbieri [[email protected]] Is anyone looking at this? I'm not sure what JetPlusTrack means, have you talked with the highPt group already? — |
Okay, you probably want to bother Yetkin some more about this. It looks Alex On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:50 PM, stepobr [email protected] wrote:
|
I am very sorry guys, I am away these days, but Alex is right, we gotta be careful about merging. The whole point of using github is to communicate well line-by-line how things are supposed to be implemented, so if anybody can give specific comments in specific lines until I become available, that would be of help. In the meanwhile I suggest we all learn everything: we should all know what JPT is, we should all know what is the approach for JECs, PAT, and ntuples in our analysis workflows, our strategies for development, etc, so that we do not rely on single person. Stepan, maybe you can start studying these and try to get a picture of how our development works? And Alex, can you motivate yourself and some other people to become masters of how everything works? Thanks. On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:15 PM, "R. Alex Barbieri" [email protected] wrote:
|
Ok I see, that's probably because besides a few new files there are modifications done to runForest_xxx.py. Cheers, Stepan From: R. Alex Barbieri [[email protected]] Okay, you probably want to bother Yetkin some more about this. It looks Alex On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:50 PM, stepobr [email protected] wrote:
— |
Hey Stepan, Yes, forest_53X_04 is the branch you should be basing your work on. If you Yetkin - Kurt, Chris, I, and a few others are slowly planning a Alex On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, stepobr [email protected] wrote:
|
Also for now please don't edit the runForest*.py configurations - make a new one with 'JPT' in the name. That should solve most of the merge conflicts and also means people aren't accidentally running your new algorithm before it is tested for memory leaks etc. |
@kurtejung are you involved with this? |
Unfortunately not - this is the first I'm hearing about the JPT algorithm. Any documentation that you have would be very useful though. I also have some time to help if people need it. |
Brian W testing pull request
…ew_cond removed setting of the HcalTopology object from the HcalZDCLowGainFracti...
PRToFixMess_RPCDigitizerForUpgrade75XPR_v2
Update effAreaPhotons_cone03_pfNeutralHadrons_V2.txt
thanks for getting this sorted
tighting the seed crystal matching
use edm::one module to be MT safe
…2-8_0_X CTPPS: bug fix #2 in run ranges for FEDs channels mapping
…phase1 Add filldescriptions and remove warning
fixed the code-format in CSCRawToDigi from scram build code-format
Add SC jets from extended tracks to event content.
* added EXOLLPJetHCAL skim (initial version) * added test script test_EXOLLPJetHCAL_SKIM.py * Replace cout with edm::Logverbatim in Geometry/GlobalTrackingGeometryBuilder * Re-enable unit tests for ASAN build * dd4hep phase2 wf * Add wf *.81 for BPH DQM * Added utility script edmFileInPath * improve unt test; use edmFileInPath; convert to bash * Replace std::cout with edm::LogVerbatim in Geometry/HcalEventSetup and Geometry/HcalTestBeamData. Also add some missing files needed for testing * Code check * Remove FWCore TestHelper utility * Add ap_data type for GT interface Update GMT emulator for new ap format Also clean up the config file Update Z0/D0 according to GT Using 0.05 for Z0 and 0.03 for d0. update code format Bug fix in tracker muon matching Thanks to Santi for spotting this. This line was commented out by someone, likely by accident. Update the reference type to SA muons * improve unit test testCreateRandomMisalignment * Add back removed data version * fix bug in computation of barycenters per partition and improve graphical display * get rid of gROOT->Reset() in GeometryComparisonPlotter.cc --------- Co-authored-by: Kiley Kennedy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sunanda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shahzad Malik Muzaffar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Norraphat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: AdrianoDee <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zhenbin Wu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cmsbuild <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: mmusich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrew David Loeliger <[email protected]>
commit a7454c6 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Mon Feb 12 14:22:51 2024 +0100 Updated binning for sigma(TOF) validation histograms Updated binning for sigma(TOF) validation histograms Updated binning for sigma(TOF) validation histograms commit e0dc3be Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 7 16:40:42 2024 +0100 Code checks && format (#2) commit 7c70ed8 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 7 15:57:59 2024 +0100 Removed debug ifdef condition on print to match previous implementation commit 2e40a9f Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 7 15:54:41 2024 +0100 Removed useless comments, files + fixed input file path for standalone MTD validation cfg file commit 199ad72 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Wed Feb 7 14:41:57 2024 +0100 Code checks && code format commit 6ec3c46 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Tue Feb 6 09:56:49 2024 +0100 Changed SigmaTof fill location in validation commit 6a0525e Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Mon Feb 5 18:11:27 2024 +0100 Change input file to validation commit cb7db5b Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Mon Feb 5 18:07:19 2024 +0100 Saving sigmaTOF in ps commit 00230ac Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Mon Feb 5 15:32:11 2024 +0100 Removed useless prints + created member vector in TrackSegments to allocate memory for sigmaTof once commit fdd6e31 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jan 9 16:08:46 2024 +0100 Added sigma(p) to TrackSegments; added sigma(TOF) computation, now saved to event commit 7d488e0 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Wed Dec 6 14:24:26 2023 +0100 testing files commit 88f9847 Author: noepalm <[email protected]> Date: Mon Feb 12 12:42:15 2024 +0100 Replaced isnan, isinf with edm::isNotFinite in MTD vertex validation
Here's a pull request to add JetPlusTrack algorithm to HiForest. Everything is done similarly to all other jet algorithms that are present in HiForest. All the changes should allow to use JPT out of the box, except the fact that JEC are not done at the PatJetProducer step. For the moment we'll be using on-fly corrections after the foresting
I was forced to put a track efficiency table CMSSW_538HI_TrackNonEff.txt in JetAnalysis/python/jets, since it isn't present in CondFormats/JetMETObjects (CMSSW_5_3_X)