Correct logic for -Wno-unknown-warning-option #58523
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
None
Purpose of change
It looks like both Apple-Clang and LLVM Clang use
-Wno-unknown-warning-option
instead of-Wno-unknown-warning
, so #57984 broke compilation (at least for my setup) due to itsCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID
beingAppleClang
.Describe the solution
This updates the logic from b1e5ada to match for both
AppleClang
andClang
(see https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_LANG_COMPILER_ID.html).Describe alternatives you've considered
It'd probably also be possible to just add both
-Wno-unknown-warning
and-Wno-unknown-warning-option
and hope that that works, but this seems a bit safer.Testing
Compilation worked fine on my machine, hoping that CI catches any other issues. @alef, if possible could you also confirm that this looks okay for what you were going for?
Additional context
See also #57984.