Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

UHF-6692: Add language content config for tpr_ontology_word_details #124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

UHF-6692: Add language content config for tpr_ontology_word_details #124

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2022

Conversation

tapsal
Copy link
Contributor

@tapsal tapsal commented Sep 15, 2022

UHF-6692

What was done

  • Added missing language content config for tpr_ontology_word_details.
    • Now, when installing the module, there is no more missing translation created ja translation changed fields.
    • Also, there is no longer an error "InvalidArgumentException: The timestamp must be numeric." when listing the tpr_ontology_word_details items.

How to test

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

teroelonen
teroelonen approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@teroelonen teroelonen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems good 🦖

@tapsal tapsal merged commit 1e94de1 into main Sep 19, 2022
@tapsal tapsal deleted the UHF-6692-mismatched-definitions branch September 19, 2022 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@teroelonen teroelonen teroelonen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tapsal @teroelonen