Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change SetChargingProfile.req attribute validation according to documentation #83

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

froehr
Copy link

@froehr froehr commented Sep 24, 2018

The documentation of "6.43. SetChargingProfile.req" states in its description that the connectorId can be "0" to identify the station itself when setting a ChargePointMaxProfile or a TxDefaultProfile the implementation does not allow "0" at the moment. I changed the validation to be able to set such profiles.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #83 into master will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #83      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     45.12%   45.2%   +0.08%     
- Complexity      821     822       +1     
===========================================
  Files           180     180              
  Lines          3712    3712              
  Branches        355     355              
===========================================
+ Hits           1675    1678       +3     
+ Misses         1949    1948       -1     
+ Partials         88      86       -2

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 47.495% when pulling 88e4ee6 on froehr:master into 6099280 on ChargeTimeEU:master.

@TVolden TVolden merged commit c548040 into ChargeTimeEU:master Sep 25, 2018
@TVolden
Copy link
Member

TVolden commented Sep 25, 2018

Hi Fabian,

You're right. Thanks for your PR. It just merged it 😃

Sincerely
Thomas

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants