Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image browse button #240

Closed
didikunz opened this issue Nov 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Image browse button #240

didikunz opened this issue Nov 24, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@didikunz
Copy link

Would be nice, if the "New Template Data" could have a "Browse..." button, that allow to select an (image-) file. It would then add the image URL to the Value area.

grab1

@dotarmin
Copy link
Contributor

I'm trying to understand if the path would be relative to the users computer or to the server?
Should the user manually "browse" to the server using the explorer|files|finder window and select an image and then use that path as value or should the user select an image on local computer?

/Armin

@didikunz
Copy link
Author

Good point. On my systems the server is normally running on the same machine as the client. So this would not matter. If the sever runns on another machine, we could hide the browse button, as it does not make much sense then.

@dotarmin
Copy link
Contributor

dotarmin commented Nov 26, 2017

And off course, we have that scenario as well, when server and client is running on the same machine just as you wrote. I forgot about that kind of setup because I'm not used to run server and client on same host.

How would this work if you have two servers mapped under client settings, one server on the same host as the client and another server on a totally different host. What would happen with the browse button then? Should the button be visible/hidden depending on server selected then? I think users would be confused when the Browse button is visible/hidden depending on server selected for a specific template item in the rundown.

Another aspect is the shadow server feature available, if used, then we're back to this scenario with one server on same host as client and another server on another host.

/Armin

@didikunz
Copy link
Author

In the case where more than one server is available I would hide the button for all items, or gray it out on items, that are set to run on the remote server. The problem then is, that it fails, when the user add such filename data and later change the item to the other server, so the best would probably be, to only show the button, when there is only one localhost server. The feature is more meant as a shortcut to quickly format these filenames for testing stuff durring template development.

@dotarmin
Copy link
Contributor

I can't see how this would be implemented in a consistent way having end users (new as pro) in mind without making them confused. Sometimes it's there and sometimes it isn't. I'm closing this issue because I can't see how it can be applied in a convenient way.

@TracyPeterson
Copy link

TracyPeterson commented Nov 27, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants