Feature request: Allow ^↑ and ^↓ to work also during "search filtering"

[paletochen]

Let's say I have a huge list of secrets, to the point that ^↑ and ^↓ is not feasible.
I would still like to sort some secrets together.
It would be great if when i use the search feature to find relevant secrets through pattern search, that when i use ^↑ and ^↓ the entries are placed together.

Example: Interested secrets are in lines 1,2,3,4 and 1235

• When i search i manage to filter just those lines
• Go to the last entry (line 1235)
• Press ^↑
• Line 1235 will become Line 5

[Canop]

@paletochen Can you check the PR #34 ?

[paletochen]

@Canop I just tried it and, it is not doing what I was expecting.

Let's say I have the following drawer:

I'd like to put all the red - XX entries together

I try a 1st search filtering like this

I then move red - 4 and bring it below red - 3

When i remove the filtering, this is how it looks like

If i try with a narrower filtering like this

and then move red - 4 again below red - 3

it looks like this

If i try another approach, like bringing red - 4 above red -3, to see if that does the trick

red -3 ends up being placed below all the entries that i had filtered out

I am not sure that behavior would be expected and therefore look like a good feature.

The problem i have in my real drawer is that all those other entries in between the ones i want to bring together are counted in the hundreds, so the result of the sorting doesn't really help. The desired entries end up being too far apart

[Canop]

I don't see how moving is supposed to guess whether red-4 is supposed to go before or after pink-1 and pink-2. This doesn't really look like a move-when-filtering problem.
Isn't your real issue solved with #35 ?

[paletochen]

I don't see how moving is supposed to guess whether red-4 is supposed to go before or after pink-1 and pink-2. This doesn't really look like a move-when-filtering problem. Isn't your real issue solved with #35 ?

I just tried #35 and I really like group matching. It gets closer to what i needed.

It would match exactly the expected behavior if i could also use #33 during a filtered search

I can imagine i would do, for the example mentioned above the following

Filter by red -

Select from the menu: Group matching

Within the same filtered search, select from the menu: Sort

Would then be possible to have Sort available during a filtered search?

[Canop]

Would then be possible to have Sort available during a filtered search?

I'll see. But if I do it, I'll do it with the minimal amount of moves, so it wouldn't group items, just change the filtered subset order.