-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
halo update bugs in ACCESS driver? #70
Comments
I've made a PR to fix this. @aidanheerdegen does ACCESS-CM2 use this same code? |
ACCESS-OM2 uses the |
The CM2 driver has these problems. I hope it's not as catastrophic as it sounds. I've started a new run with a fix. |
The bug was introduced in Dec 2014 - does that mean it doesn't affect previous versions of ACCESS-CM and ACCESS-ESM? |
A CM2 run with a fixed driver gives identical results !! ?? Does that mean these halos aren't actually used? |
Hm, maybe we got lucky then? Would we ever need to take horizontal finite differences of these scalar fields? |
I think the fluxes would only ever be used in the column. Could test by setting the halos of these variables to NaNs. |
Hi @russfiedler, following on from #68, these also look wrong to me (should be
field_type_scalar
, otherwise their signs will be flipped on the tripole in halo updates)cice5/drivers/access/cpl_interface.F90
Lines 865 to 866 in edcfa6f
and
cice5/drivers/access/cpl_interface.F90
Lines 869 to 874 in edcfa6f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: