You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The serialization bug is simple enough to fix, but this means that the current dataset has this specific bug. I will fix the current dataset, but if you've already downloaded the current one and/or don't want to wait, you'll have to modify the read_metadata method to condition on d having other fields, for example by replacing line 1065 in dire_types.py with this (untested) code:
I received an email confused about the Void type in data that looked like a Union. It turns out there is a subtle bug in the serialization code here:
DIRTY/binary/dire_types.py
Lines 918 to 924 in f1f24f4
This caused Unions to be serialized with the Void meta-tag. During deserialization, these are treated as Void types:
DIRTY/binary/dire_types.py
Lines 1041 to 1065 in f1f24f4
The serialization bug is simple enough to fix, but this means that the current dataset has this specific bug. I will fix the current dataset, but if you've already downloaded the current one and/or don't want to wait, you'll have to modify the
read_metadata
method to condition ond
having other fields, for example by replacing line 1065 indire_types.py
with this (untested) code:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: