-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refine Risk Assessment Terms: Vulnerability and Impact Functions (Update Guide_Introduction.ipynb) #802
Conversation
The choice of terminology in risk assessment models such as CLIMADA is crucial, as it shapes the framework and perspective of the analysis. The distinction between "vulnerability function" and "impact function" is particularly significant. I made some changes along the lines of making this terminology more visible. I also made changes in the documentation where vulnerability function or damage function was still referenced in order to unify the communication of CLIMADA terminology. I considered adding a few lines to explain that the concepts of damage function, vulnerability function, and impact function, though interrelated, each serve a distinct purpose. Damage functions quantify specific damages, focusing on concrete impacts. Vulnerability functions, in contrast, articulate the susceptibility of different exposures to hazards. This susceptibility encompasses more than just the potential for damage; it includes a variety of preconditions that define an exposure's overall vulnerability. Meanwhile, impact functions assess the likelihood of a hazard's effects, both negative and positive, by parameterizing the degree to which an exposure will be impacted by a particular hazard.Something along those lines..... but maybe it's too much... we can discuss it sometime ......
I think it is a great idea to clarify a bit the terminology. However, I think there are many more ways to interpret the words as those that you mentioned, so I would just be careful to not be to strong on the wording. The one thing we can be very clear about is what are In any case, thanks for the updates! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is good idea to clarify the terminology here. I would however not go more into detail as it is a general introduction, maybe in the tutorial on impact functions?
@DahyannAraya : How is this PR going? |
Thanks @DahyannAraya ! But as you can see, all tests are failing. We need to fix this first. First thing to do is merge the @zeliest : can you please see if you are satisfied and approve the PR if yes (and if all tests are passing). |
…ate Guide_Introduction.ipynb) (CLIMADA-project#802) * Update Guide_Introduction.ipynb The choice of terminology in risk assessment models such as CLIMADA is crucial, as it shapes the framework and perspective of the analysis. The distinction between "vulnerability function" and "impact function" is particularly significant. I made some changes along the lines of making this terminology more visible. I also made changes in the documentation where vulnerability function or damage function was still referenced in order to unify the communication of CLIMADA terminology. I considered adding a few lines to explain that the concepts of damage function, vulnerability function, and impact function, though interrelated, each serve a distinct purpose. Damage functions quantify specific damages, focusing on concrete impacts. Vulnerability functions, in contrast, articulate the susceptibility of different exposures to hazards. This susceptibility encompasses more than just the potential for damage; it includes a variety of preconditions that define an exposure's overall vulnerability. Meanwhile, impact functions assess the likelihood of a hazard's effects, both negative and positive, by parameterizing the degree to which an exposure will be impacted by a particular hazard.Something along those lines..... but maybe it's too much... we can discuss it sometime ...... * Update Guide_Introduction.ipynb * Implementations of comments
The choice of terminology in risk assessment models such as CLIMADA is crucial, as it shapes the framework and perspective of the analysis. The distinction between "vulnerability function" and "impact function" is particularly significant. I made some changes along the lines of making this terminology more visible. I also made changes in the documentation where vulnerability function or damage function was still referenced in order to unify the communication of CLIMADA terminology.
I considered adding a few lines to explain that the concepts of damage function, vulnerability function, and impact function, though interrelated, each serve a distinct purpose. Damage functions quantify specific damages, focusing on concrete impacts. Vulnerability functions, in contrast, articulate the susceptibility of different exposures to hazards. This susceptibility encompasses more than just the potential for damage; it includes a variety of preconditions that define an exposure's overall vulnerability. Meanwhile, impact functions assess the likelihood of a hazard's effects, both negative and positive, by parameterizing the degree to which an exposure will be impacted by a particular hazard.Something along those lines..... but maybe it's too much... we can discuss it sometime ......
Changes proposed in this PR:
This PR fixes #
PR Author Checklist
develop
)PR Reviewer Checklist