Port to gust intel and cray

[apcraig]

PR checklist

• Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
  Port to gust intel and cray
• Developer(s):
  apcraig
• Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
• Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
  Most runs pass fine with both compilers. There are some problems with a handful of cases with the cray compiler, needs more debugging. https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks#db2d7a9f92ba8e7d53c3e85d67623b787fba09c5
• How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
  • bit for bit
  • different at roundoff level
  • more substantial
• Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?
  • Yes
  • No
• Does this PR update the Icepack submodule? If so, the Icepack submodule must point to a hash on Icepack's main branch.
  • Yes
  • No
• Does this PR add any new test cases?
  • Yes
  • No
• Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)
  • Yes
  • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
    • Yes
    • No
• Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

Also chmod'ed machine files to 644.

[eclare108213]

This is showing changes to 50 files, most of which seem to be empty now!

[apcraig]

All those files just changed permissions (755 to 644). The file contents have not changed.