-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Express rheology term as a function of viscous coefficients for EVP and rEVP #639
Merged
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d4313d9
added subroutine to calc zeta and eta
JFLemieux73 d0d98e3
new subroutine now also calculates the replacement pressure
JFLemieux73 38be1a4
stress calc in evp are now with zeta, eta and rep_prs
JFLemieux73 06b4d55
corrected minor compiling issues
JFLemieux73 8b866d8
improved comments and added references for papers
JFLemieux73 c709eb3
Modif to doc for new code with viscous coefficients
JFLemieux73 8e495e0
Minor modifs to doc
JFLemieux73 85d7b71
minor correction to QC testing doc
JFLemieux73 0fc0150
Small corrections following Philippes comments
JFLemieux73 ffdd705
Changed eta,zeta to etax2,zetax2
JFLemieux73 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we also want to point out here that this is actually
2*eta
? (and same forzeta
below)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will think about it a bit more and might correct it later in another PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's confusing to use eta and zeta, especially if they are different from the 'classic' definitions. Maybe etax2 and zetax2? Or eta2 and zeta2, although those could also be ^2 rather than x2. The code isn't consistent with this kind of thing.