one-degree tripole support

[dabail10]

I didn't see an issue here already, but this was on a to do list somewhere. I looked into what it would take and the main problem I see is that the forcing would have to be remapped onto the tx1 grid. We have a tool somewhere that does this right? I was thinking the COREII forcing.

[eclare108213]

I wrote to Ed Blockley and he responded this morning with a file containing a one-degree tripoleT grid and related info. I'm not sure whether we would need to remap 'realistic' data, since we're mainly testing the boundary conditions, not the physics. If it's easy, then do it...

[eclare108213]

@dabail10 has the grid info, @rallard77 has JRA55 forcing... have a chat!

[dabail10]

So, we finally put 2 and 2 together here and David Hebert got me the JRA55 on the tx1 grid as well as an initial state for this. We need to deal with the space issues for the forcing before I can add these.

[dabail10]

Part of this is resolved. I need to add the data to Zenodo.

[dabail10]

I also have two initial files here. One that has used bilinear interpolation, and the other that has used nearest neighbor. @daveh150 did you give me these? Have you tested the code with either?

[daveh150]

Dave, I believe I made the IC for you, but I did not run any of the tests. Rick, if you ran the test, do you recall what the IC file was? From: David A. Bailey <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 13:42 To: CICE-Consortium/CICE <[email protected]> Cc: David Hebert, Code 7322 <[email protected]>; Mention <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [CICE-Consortium/CICE] one-degree tripole support (#186) I also have two initial files here. One that has used bilinear interpolation, and the other that has used nearest neighbor. @daveh150 <https://github.com/daveh150> did you give me these? Have you tested the code with either? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#186 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE52VPHUHC3XDK3RDBXRKH3RRGKAHANCNFSM4FV2Z6NQ> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AE52VPEHJUD5LDV5QB3IKITRRGKAHA5CNFSM4FV2Z6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEVTTWJI.gif>

[rallard77]

I think I used the default from the tx1 case in the test suite. I don't believe I had an IC file from you. Rick

…

On 5/12/2020 2:01 PM, daveh150 wrote: Dave, I believe I made the IC for you, but I did not run any of the tests. Rick, if you ran the test, do you recall what the IC file was? From: David A. Bailey ***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 13:42 To: CICE-Consortium/CICE ***@***.***> Cc: David Hebert, Code 7322 ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [CICE-Consortium/CICE] one-degree tripole support (#186) I also have two initial files here. One that has used bilinear interpolation, and the other that has used nearest neighbor. @daveh150 <https://github.com/daveh150> did you give me these? Have you tested the code with either? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#186 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE52VPHUHC3XDK3RDBXRKH3RRGKAHANCNFSM4FV2Z6NQ> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AE52VPEHJUD5LDV5QB3IKITRRGKAHA5CNFSM4FV2Z6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEVTTWJI.gif> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#186 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG63LB5SQKKYAHMVDYK2NVDRRGMGZANCNFSM4FV2Z6NQ>.

-- logo *Richard A. Allard * *Head, Nearshore and Coupled Models Systems Section* *Oceanography Division NRL Code 7322* *Stennis Space Center, MS 39529* *T: 228.688.4894* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> **** ******

[dabail10]

I will test both and make sure they work. I guess the bilinear is probably the preferred way to start the model?

[dabail10]

Ok. The nearest neighbor file is a problem. It aborts in the thermo right away:
(init_vertical_profile)Starting thermo, zTsn > Tmax
(init_vertical_profile)zTsn= 158.567848688701
(init_vertical_profile)Tmax= 2.428923153931408E-003
(init_vertical_profile)zqsn -18516.5183268217 -110220000.000000
110201483.481673
(icepack_warnings_setabort) T :file icepack_therm_vertical.F90 :line
817
(init_vertical_profile) init_vertical_profile: Starting thermo, zTsn > Tmax

[dabail10]

Same problem with the nearest neighbor file. I will put this on hold for a bit. I will run a 10 year run with the tx1 grid and the JRA55 forcing from the default initialization. Then I will use this restart as the default.

[daveh150]

Dave, I’ll have a look at the interpolation of those files again and try to run some test on our end to see if I can get the ICs working. Thanks, Dave From: David A. Bailey <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 14:11 To: CICE-Consortium/CICE <[email protected]> Cc: David Hebert, Code 7322 <[email protected]>; Mention <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [CICE-Consortium/CICE] one-degree tripole support (#186) Same problem with the nearest neighbor file. I will put this on hold for a bit. I will run a 10 year run with the tx1 grid and the JRA55 forcing from the default initialization. Then I will use this restart as the default. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#186 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE52VPC5AGBEO2QUC27AHZDRRGNMTANCNFSM4FV2Z6NQ> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AE52VPHFPUDMZIWDIDRLPZDRRGNMTA5CNFSM4FV2Z6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEVTXIYY.gif>

[apcraig]

I think we can close this? tx1 is being tested regularly with the JRA55 forcing. And the tx1 forcing dataset is on zenodo,

https://zenodo.org/record/4495070#.YFoqkeZlDpk

[dabail10]

The idea was also to add an initial file. We're almost there.