Ccullen cert patch 2

docs/howto/bootstrap/prepare.md

@@ -3,6 +3,22 @@
 Preparing to use SSVC involves defining a decision you want to make,
 the information you need to make that decision, and the policy you want to use to make that decision.
 
+!!! tip "Stakeholder Involvement"
+
+    Multiple organizational stakeholders should be involved in the SSVC adoption process.
+
+    - _Risk Owners_ must be involved in the development of the risk management policy represented by SSVC.
+    - _Vulnerability Management_ stakeholders, including IT Security and IT Service Management (ITSM), should 
+      be involved in the decision modeling and data mapping processes as well.
+    - _Other Roles_ depend on the organization and specific decision models being developed. For example, a Supplier
+      organization could include development and possibly service operations roles in the decision modeling process.
+      A Deployer organization might include safety and incident response roles.
+
+    Stakeholder roles and responsibilities can vary across organizations, however the contextual knowledge they can
+    bring to the decision making process is essential. SSVC adoption is not just a process for the security team or
+    technical staff.
+
+
 Here is a diagram of the preparation process:
 
 ```mermaid

docs/index.md

@@ -58,4 +58,4 @@ We have organized the SSVC documentation into four main sections:
 </div>
 
 
-{% include-markdown "_includes/helping_out.md" heading-offset=1 %}
+{% include-markdown "_includes/helping_out.md" heading-offset=1 %}

docs/topics/items_with_same_priority.md

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ The priority is equivalent.
 !!! tip "This is not CVSS"
 
     This approach may feel uncomfortable since CVSS gives the appearance of a finer grained priority.
-    CVSS appears to say, 
+    CVSS appears to say,  
     > Not just 4.0 to 6.9 is ‘medium’ severity, but 4.6 is more severe than 4.5.
-    However, as discussed {== previously (see page 4) ==}, CVSS is designed to be accurate only within +/- 0.5,
+    However, CVSS is designed to be accurate only within +/- 0.5,
     and, in practice, is scored with errors of around +/- 1.5 to 2.5 [@allodi2018effect, see Figure 1].
 
     An error of this magnitude is enough to make all of the “normal” range from 4.0 to 6.9 equivalent, because