We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More or less recently AWS published about its servers extended lifetime from 4 to 6 years.
Looking at boaviztapi/data/archetypes/server.csv, USAGE.hours_life_time is set at 35040 hours which equals to 4 years.
Should'nt we change this value to 52560 hours / 6 years ?
This is an open debate.
Contributing to the API for Azure servers (PR here), we saw Azure applied a similar policy so we choose to use 6 years as the lifetime of machines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implemented in v1.3.7
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Problem
More or less recently AWS published about its servers extended lifetime from 4 to 6 years.
Looking at boaviztapi/data/archetypes/server.csv, USAGE.hours_life_time is set at 35040 hours which equals to 4 years.
Solution
Should'nt we change this value to 52560 hours / 6 years ?
Alternatives
This is an open debate.
Additional context or elements
Contributing to the API for Azure servers (PR here), we saw Azure applied a similar policy so we choose to use 6 years as the lifetime of machines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: