Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Latest code require boost 1.74 but should only require boost 1.72 #1037

Closed
esoha-nvidia opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@esoha-nvidia
Copy link

Describe the bug
A nightly version of cudf inadvertantly depended on boost 1.74. This was reverted and latest cudf is now back to depending upon boost 1.72. In the meantime, a blazingsql nightly was created that used that mistaken cudf and the new dependency clashes with the latest cudf.

Steps/Code to reproduce bug
The list of conda releases here is used to generate the two URLs below.

  1. Examine the dependencies of the latest nightly and notice that it requires boost 1.74.
    wget 'https://anaconda.org/blazingsql-nightly/blazingsql/0.16.0a/download/linux-64/blazingsql-0.16.0a-cuda10.2_py37_52.tar.bz2'
    tar xvjf blazingsql-0.16.0a-cuda10.2_py37_52.tar.bz2
    ldd lib/libblazingsql-engine.so  | grep boost
    
  2. Examine the dependencies of the previous nightly and notice that it requires boost 1.72.
    wget 'https://anaconda.org/blazingsql-nightly/blazingsql/0.16.0a/download/linux-64/blazingsql-0.16.0a-cuda10.2_py37_25.tar.bz2'
    tar xvjf blazingsql-0.16.0a-cuda10.2_py37_25.tar.bz2
    ldd lib/libblazingsql-engine.so  | grep boost
    

Expected behavior
blazingsql should continue to depend on boost 1.72

Environment overview (please complete the following information)

  • Method of cuDF install: conda
@esoha-nvidia esoha-nvidia added ? - Needs Triage needs team to review and classify bug Something isn't working labels Sep 23, 2020
esoha-nvidia added a commit to esoha-nvidia/tpcx-bb that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2020
BlazingSQL is broken: BlazingDB/blazingsql#1037

This workaround allows the repo to work when BlazingSQL isn't enabled.
@wmalpica wmalpica removed the ? - Needs Triage needs team to review and classify label Sep 30, 2020
@wmalpica
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @esoha-nvidia a new conda package is available that no longer requires boost 1.74

ayushdg pushed a commit to rapidsai/gpu-bdb that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2020
BlazingSQL is broken: BlazingDB/blazingsql#1037

This workaround allows the repo to work when BlazingSQL isn't enabled.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants